Sender v. Franklin Resources Inc

Filing 198

ORDER re Supplemental Briefing on 194 Plaintiff's Objections to February 18, 2016 Order. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/8/2016. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/8/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

JOHN SENDER,

7

Plaintiff,

8

v.

9
10

FRANKLIN RESOURCES INC,
Defendant.

11

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S
OBJECTIONS TO FEBRUARY 18, 2016
ORDER
Docket No. 194

12
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

Case No. 11-cv-03828-EMC

On February 18, 2016, Judge Kim issued an order on Plaintiff John Sender’s motion to

13
14

compel the production of documents that Defendant Franklin Resources, Inc. withheld or redacted

15

on the basis of attorney-client privilege. Docket No. 188. Plaintiff then filed objections pursuant

16

to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 1 Docket No. 194. Defendant

17

must file an opposition to Plaintiff’s objections by March 16, 2016, not to exceed nine pages (not

18

including declarations and exhibits). No reply is permitted. Defendant should also lodge the

19

documents at issue directly with the court for in camera inspection, and not file the documents

20

with the clerk’s office.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

Dated: March 8, 2016
______________________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge

24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court notes that Plaintiff’s objections were filed in violation of Local Rule 72-2, which
states that any objection must be made as a “Motion for Relief from Nondispositive Pretrial Order
of Magistrate Judge” and may not exceed five pages.