Sender v. Franklin Resources Inc

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 57 for an Extension of Time for Plaintiff to File Reply Brief in support of Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Discovery in Light of Defendant's Inability to Timely File Opposition Memorandum filed by John Sender. Replies due by 7/9/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/3/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2012)

1

6

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP
SOLOMON B. CERA (State Bar No. 99467)
GWENDOLYN R. GIBLIN (State Bar No. 181973)
C. ANDREW DIRKSEN (State Bar No. 197378)
595 Market Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2
3
4
5

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

JOHN SENDER,

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. and DOES )
)
1-15,
)
Defendants.
)
)

18

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE
REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROPOUND
LIMITED DISCOVERY IN LIGHT
OF DEFENDANT’S INABILAITY TO
TIMELY FILE OPPOSITION
MEMORANDUM
(granted in part)

WHEREAS on June 15, 2012, plaintiff timely filed his Motion for Leave to Propound

19
20

Case No.: 11-cv-3828 EMC

Limited Discovery (“Motion”) (ECF No. 50); and
WHEREAS by orders entered June 4, 2012 and June 26, 2012, defendant Franklin

21
22

Resources, Inc. (“Defendant”) was ordered to file its opposition to the Motion on June 29, 2012;

23

and
WHEREAS Defendant was unable to timely file its opposition to the Motion until the

24
25

morning of July 2, 2012 due to a technical failure of the Court’s ECF system on June 29; and

26

WHEREAS Plaintiff’s reply papers in support of the Motion are due on July 6, 2012;

27

and

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME – Case No. 11-cv-3828 EMC
#126044

1

1
2
3

WHEREAS the delay in the filing of Defendant’s opposition to the Motion has reduced
the number of days Plaintiff otherwise would have had to prepare his reply brief;
Accordingly, good cause existing, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by

4

and between the parties hereto, through their counsel of record, that Plaintiff may have to and

5

including July 10, 2012 to file his reply brief in support of the Motion.

6

Dated: July 3, 2012

7

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP
By: /s/Solomon B. Cera
Solomon B. Cera (SBN #99467)
Gwendolyn R. Giblin (SBN #181973)
C. Andrew Dirksen (SBN #197378)
595 Market Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, CA 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Plaintiff
15
16

Dated: July 3, 2012

TRUCKER HUSS
A Professional Corporation

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

By: /s/Virginia H. Perkins
R. Bradford Huss (SBN #71303)
Charles M. Dyke (SBN #183900)
Virginia H. Perkins (SBN #215832)
One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Franklin Resources, Inc.

26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME – Case No. 11-cv-3828 EMC
#126044

2

1
2

ORDER

9
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation, Plaintiff may have to and including July 10, 2012 to

3

file his reply brief in support of Motion for Leave to Propound Limited Discovery (ECF No. 50).

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: July __, 2012

12

S

ER

R NIA

n

M. Che

FO

dward
Judge E

H

11

RT

10

NO

9

LI

8

DERED
SO OR ED
IT IS
DIFI
AS MO

A

7

RT
U
O

6

ISTR

ICT
SD
_____________________________________
TE
C
A
EDWARD M. CHEN
T
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

UNIT
ED

5

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME – Case No. 11-cv-3828 EMC
#126044

3