Sender v. Franklin Resources Inc

Filing 85

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND MOTION HEARING AND CMC FROM 1/17/13 T0 1/24/13 AT 1:30 P.M. Case Management Statement due by 1/17/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 1/24/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor , San Francisco. Motion Hearing set for 1/24/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Responses due by 12/11/2012. Replies due by 12/21/2012.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/28/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6

R. Bradford Huss, No. 71303
Charles M. Dyke, No. 183900
Virginia H. Perkins, No. 215832
TRUCKER  HUSS
A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.

9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
Trucker  Huss 
A Professional Corporation 
th
One Embarcadero Center, 12  Floor 
San Francisco, California  94111 

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13

JOHN SENDER,
Plaintiff,

14
vs.

15
16

Case No. C-11-03828 EMC

FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC. and DOES
1-15,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON FRANKLIN’S MOTIONS
UNDER RULE 12(c) AND RULE 56
(Hearing reset from 1/17/13 to 1/24/13 at 1:30 p.m.)

17
Defendant.
18
19

Plaintiff John Sender (“Sender”) and defendant Franklin Resources, Inc. (“Franklin”)

20

(together the “Parties”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby request that the

21

Court enter an Order extending the briefing schedule associated with Franklin’s Motion for

22

Summary Judgment on Statute of Limitations Grounds (Dkt. # 77) and Franklin’s Motion for

23

Judgment on the Pleadings (Dkt. # 74) (together the “Motions”), both of which were filed by

24

Franklin on November 15, 2012 and are set for hearing on January 17, 2013.

25
26

WHEREAS, under the current briefing schedule, Sender’s oppositions to the Motions are
due November 29, 2012 and Franklin’s reply briefs are due December 6, 2012;

27

WHEREAS, Sender has filed a Motion to Extend Time;

28

WHEREAS, Franklin disagrees with the basis for Sender’s Motion to Extend Time;
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
Case No. C11-03828-EMC
#1292373

1

WHEREAS, in order to conserve judicial resources, the Parties have agreed to extend the

1
2

deadline for Sender to file his opposition briefs and Franklin to file its reply briefs.
THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree, and request that the Court enter an

3
4

Order, extending the briefing schedule as follows:

5

1.

Sender shall file oppositions to the Motions no later than December 11, 2012.

6

2.

Franklin shall file reply briefs in support of the Motions no later than December 21,

7

2012.

8

PRIOR EXTENSIONS OF TIME

9

Prior extensions of time granted in this litigation include the following:


10

Sender’s Motion to Remand. (Dkt. No. 15)

11
Trucker  Huss 
A Professional Corporation 
th
One Embarcadero Center, 12  Floor 
San Francisco, California  94111 

An Order revising the briefing schedule on Franklin’s Motion to Dismiss and



12

An Order extending the time for Sender to file an amended complaint. (Dkt.
No. 29)

13
14



An Order continuing a case management conference. (Dkt. No. 31).

15



An Order extending the time for Sender to file a reply brief following a technical

16

failure of the Court’s ECF system, which prevented the timely filing of Franklin’s

17

opposition brief. (Dkt. No. 58).

18
19

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: November 27, 2012

TRUCKER  HUSS

20
By: /s/R. Bradford Huss
R. Bradford Huss, Attorneys for Defendant
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.

21
22
DATED: November 27, 2012

GOLD BENNETT CERA & SIDENER LLP

23
24

By: /s/Solomon B. Cera
Solomon B. Cera (SBN 99467)
595 Market Street, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff, JOHN SENDER

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
Case No. C11-03828-EMC
#1292373

2

1

I attest that my firm has obtained Mr. Cera’s concurrence in the filing of this document.

2
3

DATED: November 27, 2012

TRUCKER  HUSS

4
By:/s/R. Bradford Huss
R. Bradford Huss
Attorneys for Defendant
FRANKLIN RESOURCES, INC.

5
6
7
8
9
10

Trucker  Huss 
A Professional Corporation 
th
One Embarcadero Center, 12  Floor 
San Francisco, California  94111 

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
Case No. C11-03828-EMC
#1292373

3

ORDER

1
2

Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, it is ordered that:

3

1.

December 11, 2012.
2.

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
November 28, 2012

7
Dated:

RT
U
O

S DISTRICT
TE
C
____________________________________
TA
Honorable Edward M. Chen

UNIT
ED

S

8

The hearing is rescheduled from January 17, 2013 to January 24, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.

2012.

Judge of the United States District Court

10

12

RT

13

dwa
Judge E

ER

15

A

H

14

hen

rd M. C

NO

Trucker  Huss 
A Professional Corporation 
th
One Embarcadero Center, 12  Floor 
San Francisco, California  94111 

11

D
RDERE
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
AS MO

LI

9

R NIA

6

Franklin shall file reply briefs in support of the Motions no later than December 21,

FO

4

Sender shall file oppositions to the Motions (Dkt. # 74 and Dkt. # 77) no later than

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;
Case No. C11-03828-EMC
#1292373

4