Alexiou v. Soquel Creek Water District et al

Filing 43

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE ADR re 42 Stipulation filed by Soquel Creek Water District. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 11, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Thomas S. Brazier, Esq. SBN 055484 Eric Steinle, Esq./SBN 201117 LaMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI 1570 The Alameda, Suite 150 San Jose, California 95126-2305 Telephone: (408) 280-6800 Facsimile: (408) 275-6284 Attorneys for Defendant SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN ALEXIOU, Case No.: 3:11-cv-03836JR 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE ADR v. SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through undersigned counsel and after consulting with the court-appointed mediator, as follows: 1. The plaintiff’s medical bills were mostly paid by Medicare, which will now assert a statutory claim for reimbursement. 2. Under California law, the plaintiff’s medical special damages are limited to the amounts for which he is responsible, which is the amount paid by Medicare or any other third-party provider. 3. While the plaintiff has sought the conditional payment letter from Medicare, he has not received it. 4. Until the true amount of the plaintiff’s damages is reasonably clear, it will be difficult to discuss the value of the case, which is the purpose of ADR. The parties would like to have the 28 1 Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR 1 conditional payment letter if possible, so that there is objective information that all parties can look to in 2 preparing their positions. They are hopeful the letter will arrive in January. 3 4. After meeting and conferring with the mediator and making a good-faith effort, with the 4 number of parties involved, it proved impossible to schedule the mediation within the time set by this 5 court’s order, which was 90 days after the initial case management conference, or January 18, 2012. 6 7 8 9 10 5. The parties did set the mediation for February 9, 2012, the earliest date that was open for all parties and the mediator. 6. For this reason, the parties seek the court’s leave to conduct ADR on February 9, 2012 and that the time to complete ADR is continued to that date or a later date if the court sees fit. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 12 Dated: January 10, 2012 LAW OFFICE OF S. COLIN BROWN 13 By: 14 15 /s/ S. Colin Brown Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN ALEXIOU 16 17 Dated: January 10, 2012 18 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ By: 19 20 /s/ Dana McRae, County Counsel Jason M. Heath, Asst. County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ 21 22 Dated: January 10, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF LISA NICOL 23 24 By: 25 26 /s/ Lisa Nicol Attorneys for Defendant PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY 27 28 2 Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR 1 Dated: January 10, 2012 LaMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI 2 By: 3 4 5 /s/ Thomas S. Brazier Eric Steinle Attorneys for Defendant SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT 6 7 8 9 10 ORDER ON STIPULATION The stipulation of the parties to seek leave for extra time to conduct ADR on February 9, 2012 is based on good cause. It is therefore the order of this court that the parties shall conduct ADR on February 9, 2012 and the authority of the mediator is extended to that date. 11 12 13 Dated: January 11, 2012. , 2012 William Alsup UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE U. S. District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?