Alexiou v. Soquel Creek Water District et al
Filing
43
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO COMPLETE ADR re 42 Stipulation filed by Soquel Creek Water District. Signed by Judge Alsup on January 11, 2012. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
Thomas S. Brazier, Esq. SBN 055484
Eric Steinle, Esq./SBN 201117
LaMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI
1570 The Alameda, Suite 150
San Jose, California 95126-2305
Telephone: (408) 280-6800
Facsimile: (408) 275-6284
Attorneys for Defendant
SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JOHN ALEXIOU,
Case No.: 3:11-cv-03836JR
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
COMPLETE ADR
v.
SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, by and through undersigned counsel
and after consulting with the court-appointed mediator, as follows:
1.
The plaintiff’s medical bills were mostly paid by Medicare, which will now assert a
statutory claim for reimbursement.
2.
Under California law, the plaintiff’s medical special damages are limited to the amounts
for which he is responsible, which is the amount paid by Medicare or any other third-party provider.
3.
While the plaintiff has sought the conditional payment letter from Medicare, he has not
received it.
4.
Until the true amount of the plaintiff’s damages is reasonably clear, it will be difficult to
discuss the value of the case, which is the purpose of ADR. The parties would like to have the
28
1
Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR
1
conditional payment letter if possible, so that there is objective information that all parties can look to in
2
preparing their positions. They are hopeful the letter will arrive in January.
3
4.
After meeting and conferring with the mediator and making a good-faith effort, with the
4
number of parties involved, it proved impossible to schedule the mediation within the time set by this
5
court’s order, which was 90 days after the initial case management conference, or January 18, 2012.
6
7
8
9
10
5.
The parties did set the mediation for February 9, 2012, the earliest date that was open for
all parties and the mediator.
6.
For this reason, the parties seek the court’s leave to conduct ADR on February 9, 2012
and that the time to complete ADR is continued to that date or a later date if the court sees fit.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
11
12
Dated: January 10, 2012
LAW OFFICE OF S. COLIN BROWN
13
By:
14
15
/s/
S. Colin Brown
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN ALEXIOU
16
17
Dated: January 10, 2012
18
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
By:
19
20
/s/
Dana McRae, County Counsel
Jason M. Heath, Asst. County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ
21
22
Dated: January 10, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF LISA NICOL
23
24
By:
25
26
/s/
Lisa Nicol
Attorneys for Defendant
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
27
28
2
Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR
1
Dated: January 10, 2012
LaMORE, BRAZIER, RIDDLE & GIAMPAOLI
2
By:
3
4
5
/s/
Thomas S. Brazier
Eric Steinle
Attorneys for Defendant
SOQUEL CREEK WATER DISTRICT
6
7
8
9
10
ORDER ON STIPULATION
The stipulation of the parties to seek leave for extra time to conduct ADR on February 9, 2012 is
based on good cause. It is therefore the order of this court that the parties shall conduct ADR on
February 9, 2012 and the authority of the mediator is extended to that date.
11
12
13
Dated: January 11, 2012.
, 2012
William Alsup
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
U. S. District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Case No. 3:11-cv-03836JR– STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME COMPLETE ADR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?