Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 16

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER (11-3856) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
Telephone:
216.621.0200
Facsimile:
216.696.0740
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

7
8
9
10

Tracy Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11
Attorneys for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan),
Ltd.

13
14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

15

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

19
20

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI

MDL No. 1827

21
22

SCHULTZE AGENCY SERVICES, LLC,
on behalf of TWEETER OPCO, LLC and
TWEETER NEWCO, LLC,

23
Plaintiffs,

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANT MITSUI & CO.
(TAIWAN), LTD. TO RESPOND TO THE
COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

24
v.

Clerk’s Action Required

25
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,
26
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiff Schultze Agency Services, LLC (“Schultze Agency Services”) on

2

behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC (“Tweeter Opco”) and Tweeter Newco, LLC (“Tweeter Newco”)

3

(collectively “Tweeter”) filed a Complaint in the above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui

4

& Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. (“Mitsui Taiwan”), among other defendants, on July 1, 2011.

5

Whereas, Tweeter and Mitsui Taiwan previously entered into a stipulation giving Mitsui

6

Taiwan until October 20, 2011 to move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the

7

Complaint. (See Dkt. #7; MDL Dkt. #3302.)

8

WHEREAS, Tweeter and Mitsui Taiwan have reached an agreement, pursuant to Civil

9

Rule L.R. 6-1(a), pursuant to which Mitsui Taiwan shall have an additional extension until

10

December 1, 2011 in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Tweeter, on the one hand, and Mitsui

13

Taiwan, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan’s deadline to move to dismiss, answer, or

14

otherwise respond to the Complaint will be December 1, 2011.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Dated: October 4, 2011
By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.

25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2
3
4
5
6

By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno_________________
Philip J. Iovieno
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff Schultze Agency Services, LLC
on behalf of Tweeter Opco, LLC and Tweeter Newco, LLC

7
8
9

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories
thereto has been obtained.

10
[PROPOSED] ORDER

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

13

IT IS SO ORDERED.
4th
October, 2011
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.

14
By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON

15
16
17
18
19
20

503775897

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-03856-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI