Christensen v. Cotnoir et al
Filing
28
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 1/30/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2012)
1
2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
Christensen,
6
No. CV11-03864 JSW
Plaintiff,
7
v.
8
Cotnoir,
9
Defendant.
10
/
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND
PRETRIAL MATTERS
12
Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case
13
Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further
14
ORDERED that:
15
A.
DATES
16
Jury Trial Date: 12/17/2012, at 8:00 a.m., 3 - 4 days
17
Pretrial Conference: Monday, 11/5/2012, at 2:00 p.m.
18
Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 8/24/2012, 9:00 a.m.
19
Last Day for Expert Discovery: 7/18/2012
20
Close of Non-expert Discovery: 6/18/2012
21
B.
DISCOVERY
22
The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to
23
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses
24
pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of
25
non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all
26
supplementation has been completed.
27
28
1
C.
2
This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be conducted by June 30, 2012.
3
ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation.
4
D.
PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER
5
No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its
6
own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b)
7
without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline
8
contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties
9
may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the
date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule
12
that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are
13
specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain
14
leave of Court.
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
Dated: January 30, 2012
17
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?