Godbey v. Fuller et al

Filing 13

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING MOTION HEARING re 11 First MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP RUle 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted; to Strike Complaint Pursuant to California Code of Civil Proced ure SEction 425.16; or Alternatively, for a More Definite SFirst MOTION to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to FRCP RUle 12(b)(6) for Failure to State a Claim Upon which Relief can be Granted; to Strike Complaint Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure SEction 425.16; or Alternatively, for a More Definite S filed by Dan Harkins. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 28, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

MARK GODBEY,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER TO SHOW
CAUSE AND VACATING
MOTION HEARING

MEGAN FULLER, DAN HARKINS,
NEOMA GOTTLIEB, and MAUREEN
BRYAN-FURGURSON,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 11-03867 WHA

On October 12, 2011, defendant Dan Harkins filed a motion to dismiss or strike the

17

complaint (Dkt. No. 11). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of

18

non-opposition to the motion was due on October 26. None was filed. Accordingly, plaintiff

19

Mark Godbey is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why his claims against defendant Harkins

20

should not be dismissed for failure to oppose the motion. Plaintiff Mark Godbey must file a

21

written response to this order by NOVEMBER 21, 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is

22

not shown, then the motion may be granted. The motion hearing previously set for

23

November 17, 2011, is VACATED.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: October 28, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE