Goss v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

ANITA R. GOSS,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

No. C 11-3877 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

11

WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE,

12

Defendant.

/

13
14

On August 15, 2011, defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The motion is scheduled

15

for a hearing on September 30, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was

16

due by August 29, 2011. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, nor has plaintiff taken any action in this

17

case since it was removed from state court.

18

Accordingly, plaintiff is ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing to be filed no later

19

September 23, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

20

See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). The September 30, 2011 hearing on defendant’s motion to dismiss is

21

VACATED, and will be rescheduled if necessary.

22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 13, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge