Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dracup et al

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER Case Management Conference set for 2/24/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti.. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 11/3/11. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) Nicole L. Drey (SBN 250235) J. Andrew Coombs, A P. C. 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 Glendale, California 91206 Telephone: (818) 500-3200 Facsimile: (818) 300-3201 Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated George A. Shohet (SBN 112697) Law Offices of George A. Shohet 245 Main Street, Suite 310 Venice, California 90291 Telephone: (310) 452-3176 Facsimile: (310) 452-2270 Attorneys for Defendants Jonathan Dracup, an individual and d/b/a, Buy Cheap Software, Inc., and Softman Products, LLC a/k/a Softman Products Company, LLC 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) 17 18 19 20 21 Adobe Systems Incorporated, Plaintiff, v. Jonathan Dracup, et al., Defendants. 22 23 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV11-3880 SC STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Date: November 18, 2011 Time: 10:00 a.m. Court: Hon. Samuel Conti PLAINTIFF Adobe Systems Incorporated (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Jonathan Dracup, an 25 individual and d/b/a; Buy Cheap Software, Inc.; and Softman 26 Products, LLC a/k/a Softman Products Company, LLC (collectively “Defendants”), by and through 27 their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 28 Adobe v. Dracup, et al.: Stip to Continue CMC -1- 1 WHEREAS Plaintiff filed its complaint on or about August 8, 2011; 2 WHEREAS Plaintiff is to serve Defendants on or before December 6, 2011; 3 WHEREAS Defendants’ counsel has agreed to accept service for Defendants; 4 WHEREAS Plaintiff mailed a waiver of service to Defendants on or about October 25, 5 6 2011; WHEREAS Defendants have not yet returned the waiver of service and have until 7 8 November 24, 2011, to do so; 9 10 WHEREAS, upon return of the waiver of service within the prescribed timeframe, Defendants shall have until December 24, 2011, to respond to the Complaint; 11 WHEREAS Defendants have not yet filed a response to the Complaint; 12 WHEREAS the Parties are attempting to resolve the claims alleged in the Complaint 13 14 without further intervention of the Court; WHEREAS continuing the Case Management Conference until after Defendants have been 15 16 served and have had a chance to respond to the Complaint would be the most efficient use of the 17 Court’s time and resources; 18 WHEREAS continuing the Case Management Conference and all corresponding deadlines 19 will provide the Parties with additional time to engage in discussions to resolve this matter; and 20 21 22 /// 23 24 25 /// 26 27 28 Adobe v. Dracup, et al.: Stip to Continue CMC -2- February 24, 2012 @ 10:00 a.m. D RDERE OO IT IS S R NIA UNIT ED ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O S 11/3 onti A H LI RT ER FO NO amuel C Judge S N F D IS T IC T O R C PROOF OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, certify and declare that I am over the age of 18 years, employed in the County of Los Angeles, and not a party to the above-entitled cause. I am employed by a member of the Bar of the United States District Court of California. My business address is 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202, Glendale, California 91206. On November 2, 2011, I served the: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER for the following civil action: Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dracup, et al. on the following interested parties in this action: George A. Shohet Law Offices of George A. Shohet 245 Main Street, Suite 310 Venice, CA 90291 by placing a true and correct copy thereof in an envelope to be immediately sealed thereafter. I am readily familiar with the office’s practice of collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Glendale, California, in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service may be presumed invalid if the postal cancellation date or postage meter is more than one day after the date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. Place of Mailing: Glendale, California. Executed on November 2, 2011, at Glendale, California. _______/s Nicole L. Drey_______ Nicole L. Drey

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?