Adobe Systems Incorporated v. Dracup et al

Filing 48

STIPULATION AND ORDER, Granting 47 MOTION to Continue Deadline to Complete ADR and Request for Court to Delay Ruling on Defendants' Pending Motion to Dismiss or Transfer. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 4/9/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 J. Andrew Coombs (SBN 123881) andy@coombspc.com Annie S. Wang (SBN 243027) annie@coombspc.com J. Andrew Coombs, A Prof. Corp. 517 East Wilson Avenue, Suite 202 Glendale, California 91206 Telephone: (818) 500-3200 Facsimile: (818) 500-3201 Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (SAN FRANCISCO) 10 Adobe Systems Incorporated, 11 Plaintiff, v. 12 13 Jonathan Dracup, et al., Defendants. 14 Case No.: C11-3880 SC [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE OF ADR DEADLINE AND DELAY ON RULING The Parties having submitted a Joint Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Complete ADR and 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Request for Court to Delay Ruling on Defendants’ Pending Motion to Dismiss or Transfer; And good cause being shown, the request is GRANTED. Mediation must be completed by 17 18 May 15, 2012, and the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or Transfer (Docket No. 19 18) will be issued after that date in the absence of a filed Notice of Settlement or its equivalent. IT IS SO ORDERED. ERED __________________________________ O ORD IT IS S Hon. Samuel Conti United States District Judge Conti April 9, 2012 23 NO 28 By: __/s/ Annie S. Wang________________ J. Andrew Coombs Annie S. Wang Attorneys for Plaintiff Adobe Systems Incorporated Adobe v. Dracup, et al.: Proposed Order Granting Stipulation to Continue and Delay Ruling -1- A PRESENTED BY: J. Andrew Coombs, A Professional Corp. 26 27 LI ER H 25 amuel Judge S RT 24 R NIA Dated: UNIT ED 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 21 FO 20 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?