Jackmon v. America's Servicing Company et al

Filing 41

ORDER for Substitution of Counsel. Attorney Daniel Joseph Mulligan terminated. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/13/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/17/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-03884-CRB Document39 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Filed10/07/11 Page1 of 3 Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Thomas E. Loeser (Cal. Bar No. 202724) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com toml@hbsslaw.com Peter B. Fredman (Cal. Bar No. 189097) LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN 125 University Ave, Suite 102 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 868-2626 Facsimile: (510) 868-2627 peter@peterfredmanlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff AMIRA JACKMON, for herself and persons similarly situated 12 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AMERICA’S SERVICING COMPANY and ) ) WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., ) ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________ ) AMIRA JACKMON, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated, Case No. C 11-03884 CRB CLASS ACTION STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL 24 25 26 27 28 1 ___________________________________________ Stipulation and Proposed Order For Substitution of Counsel Jackmon vs. America’s Servicing Company et al – C 11-03884 CRB Case3:11-cv-03884-CRB Document39 Filed10/07/11 Page2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 TO THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS FO RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that plaintiff Amira Jackmon hereby makes the following substitution of attorneys in the above entitled action: 6 7 Former Attorney: 8 Daniel J. Mulligan (Cal. State Bar No. 103129) JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 10085 Carroll Canyon Road, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92131 Telephone: (415) 982-8500 Facsimile: (415) 982-8515 dan@jmglawoffices.com 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Substituting Attorneys: Steve W. Berman (Pro Hac Vice) Thomas E. Loeser (Cal. Bar No. 202724) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 steve@hbsslaw.com toml@hbsslaw.com Peter B. Fredman (Cal. State Bar No. 189097) LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN 125 University Ave, Suite 102 Berkeley, CA 94710 Telephone: (510) 868-2626 Facsimile: (510) 868-2627 peter@peterfredmanlaw.com 24 25 26 27 28 2 ___________________________________________ Stipulation and Proposed Order For Substitution of Counsel Jackmon vs. America’s Servicing Company et al – C 11-03884 CRB Case3:11-cv-03884-CRB Document39 CONSENT 1 2 Filed10/07/11 Page3 of 3 The undersigned hereby consent to this substitution. 3 LAW OFFICE OF PETER FREDMAN 4 5 Dated: October 7, 2011 6 7 8 By /s/ Peter Fredman Peter Fredman For himself and as attorney for Plaintiff AMIRA JACKMON HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 9 10 Dated: October 7, 2011 11 12 By /s/ Thomas E. Loeser Thomas E. Loeser JENKINS MULLIGAN & GABRIEL LLP 13 14 Dated: October 7, 2011 15 By /s/ Daniel J. Mulligan Daniel J. Mulligan 16 17 18 I, PETER FREDMAN, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this document, and in compliance with General Order No. 45, X.B., hereby attest that all signatories concur with this filing. /s/Peter Fredman 19 20 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 S RT harles Judge C R NIA NO 28 ________________________________ RED E Hon. Charles R. Breyer IS SO ORD IT United States District Judge er R. Brey FO 27 October 13, 2011 Dated:_______________ UNIT ED 26 RT U O 25 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 23 Pursuant to this stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, H 3 ___________________________________________ ER Stipulation and Proposed Order For Substitution of Counsel C N C F Jackmon vs. America’s Servicing Company et al –D 11-03884 CRB O A 22 ORDER IS T RIC T

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?