Robertson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 12

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (SI, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2011)

1
2
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6

No. C 11-03896 SI

LORENZO ROBERTSON,

7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Plaintiff,
v.

8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

EXPERIAN INFORMATION
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

/

11
12

On September 6, 2011, defendant Chex Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro

13

se complaint. The motion is scheduled for a hearing on November 18, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local

14

Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was due by September 20, 2011. Plaintiff has not yet filed an

15

opposition, nor has he communicated in any way with the Court concerning these matters. In addition,

16

defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. has filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, set for

17

hearing on December 2, 2011. Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion was due on November 3, 2011.

18

Here, too, plaintiff has neither filed an opposition nor contacted the Court in any way.

19

Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE in writing to be filed no later than

20

November 18, 2011, why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

21

See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). Plaintiff is notified that an inadequate or untimely response will result in

22

dismissal. The November 18, 2011 and December 2, 2011 hearings are hereby VACATED, and will

23

be rescheduled if necessary.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: November 8, 2011
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge