Robertson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/30/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/30/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 No. C 11-03896 SI LORENZO ROBERTSON, 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff, v. 8 9 EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 Defendants. / 11 12 On September 6, 2011, defendant Chex Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro 13 se complaint. The motion was scheduled for a hearing on November 18, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local 14 Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was due by September 20, 2011. Plaintiff did not file an opposition, 15 nor did he communicate in any way with the Court concerning these matters. In addition, defendant 16 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was set for 17 hearing on December 2, 2011. Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion was due on November 3, 2011. 18 There, too, plaintiff neither filed an opposition nor contacted the Court in any way. 19 In response, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed 20 without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Doc. 12. Plaintiff was given until November 18, 2011 21 to respond. As of November 30, 2011, the Court has received no communication from plaintiff. 22 Therefore, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff’s complaint. Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 23 41(b). 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: November 30, 2011 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?