Robertson v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 11/30/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/30/2011: # 1 Envelope) (tf, COURT STAFF).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 11-03896 SI
ORDER DISMISSING CASE
SOLUTIONS, INC., et al.,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
On September 6, 2011, defendant Chex Systems, Inc. filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s pro
se complaint. The motion was scheduled for a hearing on November 18, 2011. Pursuant to Civil Local
Rule 7-3(a), plaintiff’s opposition was due by September 20, 2011. Plaintiff did not file an opposition,
nor did he communicate in any way with the Court concerning these matters. In addition, defendant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc. filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, which was set for
hearing on December 2, 2011. Plaintiff’s opposition to that motion was due on November 3, 2011.
There, too, plaintiff neither filed an opposition nor contacted the Court in any way.
In response, the Court ordered plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed
without prejudice for failure to prosecute. See Doc. 12. Plaintiff was given until November 18, 2011
to respond. As of November 30, 2011, the Court has received no communication from plaintiff.
Therefore, the Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE plaintiff’s complaint. Fed. R. Civ. Pro.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2011
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?