Sutton v. Apple Computers Itunes et al
Filing
122
ORDER RE TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE OF INMATE AT SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE as to Roderick Williams. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 7/11/12. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/11/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
KORVEL M. SUTTON,
9
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Plaintiff(s),
ORDER RE TELEPHONIC
APPEARANCE OF INMATE AT
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
APPLE COMPUTERS ITUNES, ET AL.,
12
No. C 11-03911 LB (JCS)
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
13
14
15
16
17
18
TO ALL PARTIES, COUNSEL OF RECORD, AND PRISON PERSONNEL:
The above matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero for a further settlement
conference.
A Further Settlement Conference has been scheduled for July 25, 2012, at 9:30 a.m., in
Courtroom G, 15th Floor, Federal Building, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California.
19
Defendant Roderick Williams, is currently incarcerated at the FCI Victorville #1, in name of
20
Roderick Williams, Fed. Reg. # 15192-006, located in Adelanto, California. In order for the above-
21
referenced conference to take place, the Court must be able to confer with Defendant on July 25,
22
2012, beginning at 9:30 a.m., and continuing for the duration of the Settlement Conference. The
23
Court therefore ORDERS that Mr. Williams be made available by telephone for the
24
Settlement Conference on July 25, 2012, beginning at 9:30 a.m., and continuing for the
25
duration of the conference. FCI Victorville shall contact the clerk at (415) 522-2035 with a
26
27
28
1
2
contact phone number for the Settlement Conference.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: July 11, 2012
5
___________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
United States Magistrate Judge
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?