Duff-Brown et al v. City and County of San Francisco, California

Filing 65

STIPULATION AND ORDER to Continue Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 11/8/2013. Further Case Management Conference set for 11/18/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 08/13/2013. (tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/13/2013)

Download PDF
Duff-Brown et al v. City and County of San Francisco, California 1 2 3 4 Doc. 65 DUANE W. RENO, State Bar #67262 DAVIS & RENO 22 Battery Street, Suite 1000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 274-8700 Facsimile: (415) 274-8770 6 PETER F. CARON, State Bar #157364 2030 Divisadero Street San Francisco, CA 94115 Telephone: (415) 831-4204 7 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669 City Attorney ELIZABETH SALVESON, State Bar #83788 Chief Labor Attorney RUTH M. BOND, State Bar #214582 Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94102-5408 Telephone: (415) 554-3976 Facsimile: (415) 554-4248 E-Mail: ruth.bond@sfgov.org 5 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 FREDA J. DUFF-BROWN, DENISE BROWN, CHARMINE C. DELA VEGA, FAY P. LEE, DOUG MCKIRAHAN, JAY E. MITCHELLWRIGHT, FERNANDO GARCIA, DARREN PAGE, FREDERICK ALEXANDER, NANCY ZHANG, PERCIVAL GARCIA, DENNIS LIM, JOSE SALINAR, DORIS BROWN, RONALDO VALENCIA, PETER MBAH, JACINTO A. BAUTISTA, THELMA E. MADAYAG, VIMLA BEHARI, NORBERTO PASCULA JR., NANCY B. NONILLA, EDGAR PADA, FE PURGANAN, Et Al., 25 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SET FOR AUGUST 19, 2013; [PROPOSED] ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED AS MODIFIED Plaintiffs, 26 Case No. CV 11-03917 (TEH) vs. 27 28 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant. STIP. & REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC SET FOR 8/19/13 – CASE NO. CV 11-03917 TEH n:\labor\li2011\120225\00865993.doc Dockets.Justia.com 1 The parties in the above-captioned action hereby stipulate and request to continue the further 2 Case Management Conference set for August 19, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. At the previous Case 3 Management Conference held on June 24, 2013, the parties agreed to attempt to take the depositions 4 of several witnesses by the end of July. However, because of witness availability and scheduling 5 conflicts of counsel for Plaintiffs and the Defendant, the parties have been unable to schedule the 6 depositions until the weeks of October 21 and 28, 2013. The parties expect to complete the necessary 7 depositions by November 1. Therefore, the parties request a continuance of the Case Management 8 Conference to November 4, 2013, or for a time as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. 9 10 Respectfully submitted: Dated: August 12, 2013 11 DAVIS & RENO 12 By: /s/Duane W. Reno_ DUANE W. RENO 13 14 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 Dated: August 12, 2013 17 18 19 20 DENNIS J. HERRERA City Attorney ELIZABETH SALVESON Chief Labor Attorney RUTH M. BOND Deputy City Attorney 21 22 23 24 By:/s/Ruth M. Bond __ RUTH M. BOND Attorneys for Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 25 26 27 28 STIP. & REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC SET FOR 8/19/13 – CASE NO. CV 11-03917 TEH 1 n:\labor\li2011\120225\00865993.doc ORDER 1 D ________________________________ RDERE 08/13/2013 Dated: ________________ T IS SO A O 7 NO 8 lton E. dge The Ju RT 9 son Hender H ER 10 11 R NIA I IF E HENDERSON THE HON. THELTONIE.D S MOD FO 6 UNIT ED 5 RT U O IT IS SO ORDERED. S 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA LI 3 Pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, the further Case Management Conference set for August 18 19, 2013, is hereby continued to November 4, 2013. A 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC SET FOR 8/19/13 – CASE NO. CV 11-03917 TEH 2 n:\labor\li2011\120225\00865993.doc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?