Boyter v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 36

ORDER continuing ADR conference. Signed by Judge Illston on 1/19/12. (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2012)

1
2
3

Law Offices of Mark Lapham (SBN: 146352)
751 Diablo Rd.
Danville, CA 94526
Attorney for Plaintiff

4

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

5
6
7

ROBERT MICHAEL BOYTER

Case No: CV 11-3943 SI

8

Plaintiff,

9
10
11
12
13
14

REQUEST THAT THE COURT ORDERED
ADR ANALYSIS BE CONTINUED UNTIL
FEBRUARY 9th, 2012

v.
WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., MORTGAGE
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS,
INC., NDEX WEST, LLC AND DOES 1-100
Defendants.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

The Parties in this case had their initial conference call whether or not an Alternative
Dispute Resolution would be warranted on December 29, 2011 in this case. Daniel Bowling has
been assigned by the Court to recommend to the Court whether ADR is appropriate in this case.
After the call, it was determined that there was a need for further discussions with Mr. Bowling

22

before he could render his recommendation to the Court. He therefore assigned February 9,

23

2012 as the date for the next conference call. Plaintiff through his counsel, and Defendants

24

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., represented by Mr.

25

Ronald M. Arlas, and Defendant NDeX West, LLC represented by Mr. Thomas K. Agawa, have

26

all stipulated to this date for continuing the ADR report.

27
28

Based on the above facts, it is respectfully requested that an order be issued affirming the
above continuance.
- 1

1

Respectfully submitted:

2

7

11
12

By: /s/Ronald M. Arlas
RONALD M. ARLAS, ESQ.

ER

H

10

15
16
17

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, LLC

13
14

ston

usan Ill

Judge S

RT

9

Dated: January 17, 2012

NO

8

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

Dated: January 16, 2012
By: /s/Thomas K. Agawa
THOMAS K. AGAWA, ESQ.
Attorneys for Defendant NDeX West, LLC

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

- 2

R NIA

Attorney for Plaintiff

LI

6

A

5

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

By: _________________
MARK LAPHAM

UNIT
ED

4

S

Dated: January 16, 2012

RT
U
O

3

C