Bensi et al v. Brown et al
Filing
40
ORDER by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting 39 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Peter Alexis Magganas terminated (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/31/2012)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
PAUL BENSI,
8
9
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
COUNSEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW
v.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C -11-03944 EDL
RICHARD THOMAS BROWN JR, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
13
/
Before the Court is an unopposed motion by Attorney Peter Magganas for permission to
14
withdraw as counsel for Defendants. Because this matter is appropriate for decision without oral
15
argument, the September 18, 2012 hearing is vacated.
16
Counsel states that he and his clients have agreed to terminate their attorney-client
17
relationship because counsel is planning on moving out of state. See Magganas Decl. ¶¶ 1-2. An
18
individual Defendant has agreed to be the authorized contact person for Defendants. See Mot. at 2.
19
Good cause appearing, the motion to withdraw as counsel for Defendants is granted. Defendant
20
Richard Brown shall serve as the authorized person for paperwork, notice, service and all other
21
contact until Defendants retain substitute counsel. As stated in the motion, mail for Mr. Brown may
22
be sent to: 339 Parker Ave., #14, Rodeo, CA 94572.
23
Defendants are reminded that under this Court’s Local Rules, “a corporation, unincorporated
24
association, partnership or other such entity may appear only through a member of the bar of this
25
Court.” N.D. Cal. Civ. R. 3-9(b). Thus, to the extent that any Defendants are corporate entities,
26
they must obtain new counsel in this matter and may not proceed pro se.
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 31, 2012
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?