Blackmon v. Division of Adult Parole Operation Region 2 et al

Filing 29

ORDER referring case to Judge White for related case determination. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/16/2012. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/17/2012: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (ls, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco VALDEZ BLACKMON, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. C 12-01185 LB ORDER REFERRING CASE FOR RELATED CASE DETERMINATION v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OPERATIONS, et al., 16 17 Defendants. _____________________________________/ 18 On March 9, 2012, Plaintiff Valdez Blackmon filed a complaint against Defendants California 19 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Adult Parole Operations, Region 2; J. 20 Larson; James Scaver; and Ray Poliakoff. Complaint, ECF No. 1. He also filed an application to 21 proceed in forma pauperis. Application, ECF No. 2. 22 Mr. Blackmon was the plaintiff in a case against these same Defendants that he filed in 2011. 23 See Blackmon v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Division of Adult Parole 24 Operations, Region 2, et al., No. C11-03948 JSW. Judge White presided over that case. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-12(c), the instant action is HEREBY REFERRED to Judge White 25 26 for consideration of whether the above-referenced actions are related. 27 /// 28 /// C 12-01185 LB ORDER REFERRING CASE 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 16, 2012 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 12-01185 LB ORDER REFERRING CASE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?