De Abadia-Peixoto et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Filing
136
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/23/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
UELIAN DE ABADIA-PEIXOTO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
14
15
16
17
No. C 11-4001 RS
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
18
19
Defendants seek review of a discovery order issued by the assigned magistrate judge.
20
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, motions to challenge non-dispositive rulings of magistrate judges
21
are not set for briefing or hearing absent an order. Accordingly, the purported briefing schedule set
22
out in the docket entry may be disregarded. Plaintiffs shall file any response to the challenge within
23
14 days of the date of this order. As defendants’ motion exceeds the page limits of Rule 72-2,
24
plaintiffs’ opposition may also be up to seven pages long, including pages bearing the caption and
25
signature blocks. Upon the filing of plaintiffs’ response, the matter will be submitted for decision
26
without further briefing or oral argument, unless otherwise subsequently ordered.
27
28
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
5
Dated: 4/23/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?