De Abadia-Peixoto et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al

Filing 136

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 4/23/13. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

UELIAN DE ABADIA-PEIXOTO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.

14
15
16
17

No. C 11-4001 RS
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR OBJECTION TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY, et al.,
Defendants.
____________________________________/

18
19

Defendants seek review of a discovery order issued by the assigned magistrate judge.

20

Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 72-2, motions to challenge non-dispositive rulings of magistrate judges

21

are not set for briefing or hearing absent an order. Accordingly, the purported briefing schedule set

22

out in the docket entry may be disregarded. Plaintiffs shall file any response to the challenge within

23

14 days of the date of this order. As defendants’ motion exceeds the page limits of Rule 72-2,

24

plaintiffs’ opposition may also be up to seven pages long, including pages bearing the caption and

25

signature blocks. Upon the filing of plaintiffs’ response, the matter will be submitted for decision

26

without further briefing or oral argument, unless otherwise subsequently ordered.

27
28

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3
4
5

Dated: 4/23/13
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2