Campbell v. Hill Physicians Medical Group, Inc.

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER extending Defendants time to respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to 10/5/12. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2012)

Download PDF
1 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP LISA BARNETT SWEEN (SBN: 191155) 2 NATALJA FULTON (SBN: 254858) One Sansome Street, Suite 1400 3 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 362-2580 4 Facsimile: (415) 434-0882 5 Attorneys for Defendant PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED 6 MEDICAL GROUP, INC. (a dissolved California corporation) 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 Case No. 3:11-cv-04041-SC 11 LARRY CAMPBELL, Plaintiff, 12 13 FURTHER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT [LOCAL RULE 6-1(A)] v. 14 HILL PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC., PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED MEDICAL 15 GROUP, INC., Defendants. 16 Judge: Honorable Samuel Conti Amended Complaint Filed: March 23, 2012 [JURY TRIAL DEMANDED] 17 CLASS ACTION 18 19 20 Plaintiff LARRY CAMPBELL (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED 21 MEDICAL GROUP, INC. (“Defendant”), through their counsel of record and pursuant to Local 22 Rule 6-1(a), stipulate and extend the time by which this Defendant has to answer or otherwise 23 respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. 24 STIPULATION 25 26 WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed his Amended Complaint on March 23, 2012; 27 LEWIS WHEREAS, Plaintiff originally filed this action on August 18, 2011; WHEREAS, Plaintiff served his Amended Complaint naming this Defendant on June 6, 28 2012, and the current deadline for Defendant’s response to the Amended Complaint is September BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW 4838-4010-8561.1 3:11-cv-04041-SC 1 FURTHER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 1 21, 2012; WHEREAS, upon mutual agreement, Plaintiff and Defendant stipulate and agree that this 2 3 Defendant may have an extension until October 5, 2012, to answer or otherwise respond to 4 Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint; 5 WHEREAS, the Parties have a Case Management Conference on December 7, 2012; 6 WHEREAS, this extension of time will not alter the date of any event or deadline already 7 fixed by the Court; ACCORDINGLY, Plaintiff and Defendant hereby stipulate to an extension of time to October 8 9 5, 2012 for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. 10 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 11 Respectfully Submitted, 12 DATED: September 21, 2012 LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGAARD & SMITH LLP 13 By /s/ Lisa Barnett Sween Natalja M. Fulton Attorneys for Defendant PHYSICIANS INTEGRATED MEDICAL GROUP, INC. 14 15 16 17 18 DATED: September 21, 2012 19 20 BRAMSON, PLUTZIK, MAHLER & BIRKHAEUSER, LLP Robert M. Bramson Daniel E. Birkhaeuser CONSUMER LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, P.C. Leonard Bennett Matthew J. Erausquin 21 22 ERED O ORD IT IS S 26 BISGAARD & SMITH LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW FO By /s/ Robert M. Bramson Daniel E. Birkhaeuser Leonard Bennett Matthew J. Erausquin Attorneys for Plaintiff LARRY CAMPBELL LI ER A H BRISBOIS 28 Judge S RT LEWIS onti amuel C NO 27 R NIA UNIT ED 25 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T RT U O 24 S 23 N F D IS T IC T O R 4838-4010-8561.1 C 3:11-cv-04041-SC 2 FURTHER STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO AMENDED COMPLAINT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?