Avocet Sports Technology, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc. et al
Filing
95
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 85 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Avocet Sports Technology, Inc. filed by Avocet Sports Technology, Inc.. Signed by Judge James Ware on 2/14/12. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/14/2012)
Case3:11-cv-04049-JW Document85 Filed02/03/12 Page1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
AVOCET SPORTS
TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
GARMIN INTERNATIONAL,
INC., et al.,
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
CASE NO. ______________________
5:11-cv-04049-LHK JW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
✔
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
After Phase One proceedings, as proposed
✔
9
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
in Case Management Conference Report
filed herewith.
Dated:___________
Feb. 3, 2012
____________________________
/s/ Frear Stephen Schmid
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
Feb. 3, 2012
____________________________
/s/ Michelle L. Marriott
Attorney for Defendant GARMIN
/s/ Rachel M. Walsh
Attorney for Def. Casio
Dated:
Feb. 3, 2012
Dated: Feb. 3, 2012
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
/s/ Janelle M. Smith
Attorney for Def. Polar Electro
Case3:11-cv-04049-JW Document85 Filed02/03/12 Page2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9X
9
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: February 14, 2012
__________________________________
CHIEF DISTRICT
MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?