Mazzaferro v. Stanaland et al

Filing 57

ORDER re 56 Order Discovery Hearing set for 9/27/2012 before Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 8/10/2012. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/10/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 RONALD MAZZAFERRO, No. C 11-04097 SI (DMR) 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER RE DISCOVERY 8 v. 9 RUSSELL STANALAND, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 12 Judge Illston referred this case to the undersigned for discovery purposes and instructed this 13 court to contact the parties and begin developing a discovery schedule. Judge Illston further 14 indicated that the discovery in this case should not duplicate discovery in the state court case. To 15 that end, by no later than September 7, 2012, each party shall file a written document that sets forth 16 in sufficient detail: (1) a brief description of the state court case, including its status; (2) the 17 discovery that has taken place in the state court case; (3) discovery that is anticipated to take place 18 in the state court case, if that case is ongoing; and (4) the discovery that the party intends to 19 propound in this case. 20 The court shall hold a telephonic discovery conference on September 27 at 11:00 a.m. 21 The parties shall follow the protocol set forth in the attached Notice re Telephonic Appearance 22 Procedures for Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: August 10, 2012 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 1 2 3 NOTICE RE TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE PROCEDURES FOR MAGISTRATE JUDGE DONNA M. RYU EFFECTIVE APRIL 11, 2012 I. POLICY GOVERNING TELEPHONIC APPEARANCES 4 11 A party representative (or a party if in pro se) generally must appear in person for a hearing or case management conference. Permission to attend by telephone may be granted, in the Court's discretion, upon written request made at least one week in advance of the hearing if the Court determines that good cause exists to excuse personal attendance, and that personal attendance is not needed in order to have an effective hearing or conference. The facts establishing good cause must be set forth in the request. All telephonic appearances must be made through CourtCall, an independent conference call company, pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section II. If an individual schedules a telephonic appearance and then fails to respond to the call of a matter on calendar, the Court may pass the matter or may treat the failure to respond as a failure to appear. Scheduling simultaneous telephonic appearances in multiple courts does not excuse a failure to appear. Individuals making use of the conference call service are cautioned that they do so at their own risk. Hearings generally will not be rescheduled due to missed connections. 12 II. SCHEDULING A TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE. 5 6 7 8 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 13 14 15 If the Court grants a party's request for telephonic appearance, the party shall arrange for the appearance by calling CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 not later than 3:00 p.m. the court day prior to the hearing date. 16 III. PROCEDURE FOR TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE. 17 Court Call will provide counsel with written confirmation of a telephonic appearance, and give counsel a number to call to make the telephonic appearance. It is counsel's responsibility to dial into the call not later than 10 minutes prior to the scheduled hearing. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 CourtCall does not place a call to counsel. The initial charge per participant for a CourtCall appearance is $30.00 for the first 45 minutes you are connected. For each additional 15 minute increment the charge is $7.00. If you do not timely call and connect with the Court Call operator, you will be billed for the call and the hearing may proceed in your absence. Telephonic appearances are connected directly with the courtroom's public address system and electronic recording equipment so that a normal record is produced. To ensure the quality of the record, the use of car phones, cellular phones, speakerphones, public telephone booths, or phones in other public places is prohibited except in the most extreme emergencies. Participants should be able to hear all parties without difficulty or echo. 27 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 At the time of your hearing, you may initially be in the listening mode in which case you will be able to hear the case before yours just as if you were in the courtroom. After your call is connected to the courtroom, the Judge will call the case, request appearances, and direct the manner in which the hearing proceeds. Each time you speak, you should identify yourself for the record. The court's teleconferencing system allows more than one speaker to be heard, so the Judge can interrupt a speaker to ask a question or redirect the discussion. When the Judge informs the participants that the hearing is completed, you may disconnect and the next case will be called. Telephonic appearances by multiple participants are only possible when there is compliance with every procedural requirement. Sanctions may be imposed when there is any deviation from the required procedures or the Court determines that a person's conduct makes telephonic appearances inappropriate. Sanctions may include dropping a matter from calendar, continuing the hearing, proceeding in the absence of an unavailable participant, a monetary sanction, and/or a permanent prohibition against a person appearing telephonically. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Court Call Telephone Appearance Procedure 3/28/2012 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?