Californians for Alternatives to Toxics v. North Coast Railroad Authority et al

Filing 33

ORDER GRANTING re (32 in 3:11-cv-04102-JCS) Stipulation/Amendment to Stay filed by North Coast Railroad Authority, (20 in 3:11-cv-04103-JCS) Stipulation/Amendment to Stay filed by North Coast Railroad Authority. STAY is extended to 1/26/12. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 12/21/11. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/22/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY Attorney at Law (#69220) 110 S. Main St., Ste. C Willits, CA 95490 Telephone: (707) 459-5551 Facsimile: (707) 459-3018 e-mail: cjneary@pacific.net 4 5 Attorney for Defendant NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 16 ) Case No.: CV 11 4102 JCS ) And Related Case No. CV 11 4103 JCS ) Petitioner/Plaintiff, ) AMENDMENT TO STAY AND [Proposed] ORDER ) vs. ) ) NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY, et al., ) ) Respondents/Defendants. ) ) _________________________________________ ) ) And Related Case ) 17 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Petitioner/Plaintiff CALIFORNIANS FOR 10 11 12 13 14 15 CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS, 18 ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS (“CATS”) and Respondents/Defendants NORTH COAST RAILROAD 19 AUTHORITY and BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY (collectively 20 “NCRA”) as follows: 21 22 23 24 25 A. WHEREAS on October 7, 2011, the parties filed a Stipulation to Stay this action (Document # 28); B. WHEREAS on October 11, 2011 the Court approved the Stipulation to Stay, staying the action until November 11, 2011 (Document # 29); C. WHEREAS on November 15, 2011 the parties filed a Stipulation to Continue 26 the Stay (Document #30) and the Court approved the continuance of stay by Order on 27 November 16, 2011 (Document #31) staying the action until December 26, 2011; and 28 STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER - 1 D. 1 WHEREAS, the parties continue to engage in settlement discussions and 2 have a good faith belief that settlement can and should be pursued further and agree 3 to conduct further good faith settlement discussions with all parties. 4 NOW THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: 5 1. 6 The Stay of the case until December 26, 2011 as approved by the Court on November 16, 2011 (Document # 31)shall be amended as follows: a. 7 The stay shall be extended to January 26, 2012 to accommodate 8 further settlement discussions. However, the stay may be revoked upon twenty-four 9 (24) hours’ written notice by any party to all parties in this action, and to all 10 parties in the related case referred to in the caption hereinabove, and to the Court. 11 The termination of the stay shall be amended to be defined as January 26, 2012, or one 12 (1) day after the date of the written notice of revocation filed by any party, 13 hereinafter referred to as “Termination of the Stay.” 2. 14 All other provisions of the Stipulation (Documents # 28 as amended by 15 Document #30) and as amended and approved by the Court on October 11, 2011 and 16 November 16, 2011(Documents #29 and #31) shall remain in full force and effect. 17 18 DATED: December 21, 2011 19 /s/ _________________________________ SHARON E. DUGGAN Attorneys for Petitioner CALIFORNIANS FOR ALTERNATIVES TO TOXICS 20 DATED: December 21, 2011 DATED: 21 December 21, 2011 22 23 24 25 26 /s/ __________________________________ CHRISTOPHER J. NEARY Attorney for Respondents, NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF NORTH COAST RAILROAD AUTHORITY /s/ __________________________________ DOUGLAS BOSCO Attorney for NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 27 28 STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER - 2 [Proposed] ORDER 1 FO H ER LI RT 6 __________________________________ JOSEPH C. SPEROseph C. Spero Judge Jo U.S. Magistrate Judge NO 5 21 December____, 2011 A DATED: 4 R NIA 3 UNIT ED 2 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. N F D IS T IC T O R 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [Proposed] ORDER - 3 C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?