Sidense Corp. v. Kilopass Technology Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/23/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 SIDENSE CORP., 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 No. C 11-04112 SI Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVER CUTOFF DATE v. KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC. and CHARLIE CHENG, Defendants. / 14 This action is related to an earlier action, Kilopass v. Sidense, CV 10-2066 SI. Defendants 15 Kilopass and Charlie Cheng filed a motion to modify the fact discovery cutoff date in this action 16 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3. See Doc. 21. The cutoff for non-expert discovery was set for 17 December 19, 2011; Kilopass seeks an extension to February 15, 2012. Plaintiff Sidense agrees to the 18 extension, provided that Kilopass not be allowed to depose Sidense’s already-noticed witnesses twice 19 (once in each of the related actions). The Court agrees with Sidense that this is a reasonable solution. 20 All witnesses will be presumptively limited to a single deposition; however, if good cause is shown, a 21 second may be allowed, but only through Court order. Therefore, Kilopass’ motion is GRANTED IN 22 PART and DENIED IN PART. The cutoff for non-expert discovery is now set for February 15, 2012. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: December 23, 2012 27 28 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?