Sidense Corp. v. Kilopass Technology Inc. et al

Filing 33

ORDER RE: DISCOVERY CUTOFF DATE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/23/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

SIDENSE CORP.,

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13

No. C 11-04112 SI

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DISCOVER CUTOFF DATE

v.
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY INC. and
CHARLIE CHENG,
Defendants.

/

14
This action is related to an earlier action, Kilopass v. Sidense, CV 10-2066 SI. Defendants
15
Kilopass and Charlie Cheng filed a motion to modify the fact discovery cutoff date in this action
16
pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3. See Doc. 21. The cutoff for non-expert discovery was set for
17
December 19, 2011; Kilopass seeks an extension to February 15, 2012. Plaintiff Sidense agrees to the
18
extension, provided that Kilopass not be allowed to depose Sidense’s already-noticed witnesses twice
19
(once in each of the related actions). The Court agrees with Sidense that this is a reasonable solution.
20
All witnesses will be presumptively limited to a single deposition; however, if good cause is shown, a
21
second may be allowed, but only through Court order. Therefore, Kilopass’ motion is GRANTED IN
22
PART and DENIED IN PART. The cutoff for non-expert discovery is now set for February 15, 2012.
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
26
Dated: December 23, 2012
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge