P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al

Filing 43

ORDER granting extention of time to respond to complaint re #41 .(#4202) (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/1/2011) Modified on 12/2/2011 (ysS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
Telephone:
216.621.0200
Facsimile:
216.696.0740
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

8
9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Defendants Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan),
Ltd. and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc.

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19

IN RE: TFT-LCD (FLAT PANEL)
ANTITRUST LITIGATION

Master File No. 3:07-md-1827-SI

20
21

Case No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI

This Document Relates to Individual Case
No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI

MDL No. 1827

22
23

P.C. RICHARD & SON LONG ISLAND
CORPORATION, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

24
25

v.

26

STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS MITSUI & CO.
(TAIWAN), LTD. AND MITSUI & CO.
(U.S.A.), INC. TO RESPOND TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER

AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et al.,

27

Defendants.

Clerk’s Action Required

28
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN AND MITSUI USA TO RESPOND TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

WHEREAS, plaintiffs P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, Marta Cooperative

2

of America, Inc., and ABC Appliance, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) filed a First Amended Complaint in the

3

above-captioned action against defendant Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd. (“Mitsui Taiwan”) and

4

Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A.), Inc. (“Mitsui USA”), among other defendants, on June 15, 2011.

5

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Mitsui Taiwan and Mitsui USA, among other defendants,

6

previously entered into a stipulation, giving Mitsui Taiwan and Mitsui USA until December 5,

7

2011 to move to dismiss, answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. (See

8

Dkt. #28; MDL Dkt. #3956).

Devices Corp., et al., Individual Docket No. 3:10-cv-00117-SI (N.D. Cal.), Master Docket No.

12
CLEV ELA ND

amended complaint in the related case of Electrograph Systems, Inc., et al. v. Epson Imaging

11
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

WHEREAS, on December 1, 2011, Mitsui Taiwan intends to move to dismiss the

10
B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

9

3:07-md-01827-SI (N.D. Cal.) on the grounds that the Court lacks personal jurisdiction over

13

Mitsui Taiwan.

14
15
16
17

WHEREAS, Mitsui Taiwan also intends to raise lack of personal jurisdiction as a defense
in the instant case.
WHEREAS, the Court’s ruling on Mitsui Taiwan’s motion to dismiss in Electrograph
may be relevant to the issue of personal jurisdiction in the instant case.

18

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, Mitsui Taiwan and Mitsui USA have reached an agreement,

19

pursuant to Civil Rule L.R. 6-1(a), that Mitsui Taiwan and Mitsui USA shall have an additional

20

extension of time until twenty-one (21) days after the Court rules on Mitsui Taiwan’s motion to

21

dismiss in Electrograph, in which to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’

22

First Amended Complaint.

23

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the

24

undersigned counsel, on behalf of their respective clients, Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and Mitsui

25

Taiwan and Mitsui USA, on the other hand, that Mitsui Taiwan and Mitsui USA’s deadline to

26

move to dismiss, answer, or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint will be twenty-

27

one (21) days after the Court issues its order on Mitsui Taiwan’s motion to dismiss the amended

28

complaint in Electrograph.
1
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN AND MITSUI USA TO RESPOND TO THE
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1

Dated: November 29, 2011

2

By: /s/ Michael E. Mumford_____________
Paul P. Eyre
Ernest E. Vargo
Michael E. Mumford
Erin K. Murdock-Park
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
PNC Center
1900 East Ninth Street, Suite 3200
Cleveland, Ohio 44114-3482
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Tracy L. Cole
BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP
45 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Defendants Mitsui & Co. (Taiwan), Ltd.
and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A), Inc.
By: /s/ Philip J. Iovieno_________________
Philip J. Iovieno
BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
10 North Pearl Street, 4th Floor
Albany, NY 12207
[phone] (Phone)
[phone] (Facsimile)
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiffs P.C. Richard & Son
Long Island Corporation, Marta Cooperative
of America, Inc., and ABC Appliance, Inc.

24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI

1
2

Attestation: The filer of this document attests that the concurrence of the other signatories
thereto has been obtained.

3

[PROPOSED] ORDER

4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5

30th
Nov
2011
DATED this ___ day of _____________, _____.

6
7

By: _______________________________________
Hon. SUSAN ILLSTON

8
9
10

12
CLEV ELA ND

ATTO RNEY S AT LAW

B AKER & H OSTE TLER LLP

11

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION OF EXTENSION OF TIME FOR MITSUI
TAIWAN TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT

Case No. 3:11-cv-04119-SI
Master File No. 3:07-md-01827-SI