Bencivenga v. US Bank, National Association et al
Filing
47
ORDER STAYING ACTION (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 3/29/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
MARC ANTHONY BENCIVENGA,
9
Plaintiff,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. C 11-04128 SI
ORDER STAYING ACTION
v.
US BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as
Trustee of GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST,
Series 2005-11, BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER
TREDER & WEISS LLP, GRACE EVERITT,
DOES 1-10
Defendant.
/
15
16
Before the Court is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).
17
The motion is scheduled for a hearing on March 30, 2012. For the reasons set forth below, the Court
18
VACATES the hearing and STAYS the action pending notification regarding whether plaintiff’s
19
bankruptcy trustee abandons plaintiff’s claims.
20
21
BACKGROUND
22
On or about June 6, 2005, plaintiff Marc Anthony Bencivenga purchased a home (the
23
“Property”) at 2054 Oak Ridge Drive, Santa Rosa, California 95404 in Sonoma County. FAC ¶ 14. On
24
June 28, 2005, plaintiff signed a Deed of Trust for $568,000 identifying Residential Mortgage Capital
25
as the “lender” and First American Title as “trustee.” Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice (“RJN”)
26
27
28
1
Exhibit A.1 Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. (“MERS”) retained a beneficial interest
2
under the Deed of Trust. Id.
On August 27, 2010, NDEx West, LLC recorded a Notice of Default and Election to Sell Under
4
Deed of Trust on the Property. RJN, Exhibit B. In issuing this notice, NDEx West purported to act as
5
the agent of MERS, the beneficiary of the trust. RJN, Exhibit B at 2. Attached to the notice is a
6
certification that NDEx West followed California non-judicial foreclosure procedure under Cal. Civ.
7
Code § 2923.5 by contacting or performing due diligence by attempting to contact the borrower
8
regarding the foreclosure notice. Id. at 3. On September 17, 2010, an Assignment of Deed of Trust was
9
recorded on the property, granting defendant U.S. Bank all beneficial interest set forth under the Deed
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
3
of Trust. RJN, Exhibit C. On October 1, 2010, a Substitution of Trustee was filed on the Property
11
replacing original trustee First American Title with NDEx West. RJN, Exhibit D. The Substitution of
12
Trustee was executed by Xee Moua, who, according to the FAC, has admitted that she did not verify
13
all of the information in filings she signed. FAC ¶ 20. On December 1, 2010, a Notice of Trustee’s Sale
14
was recorded on the property by NDEx West. RJN, Exhibit E.
15
Plaintiff thereafter filed for Chapter 7 Bankruptcy protection on March 8, 2011, which was
16
discharged on June 16, 2011. RJN, Exhibit F. On July 15, 2011, the Property was sold at public auction
17
to U.S. Bank. RJN, Exhibit G. Plaintiff did not list the claims asserted in this action on his bankruptcy
18
schedule of assets.
19
On August 22, 2011, plaintiff filed this action in pro per against defendants U.S. Bank National
20
Association as trustee for GSAA Home Equity Trust, Series 2005-11, Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder
21
& Weiss, LLP, Grace Everitt, and Does 1-20. After defendants filed a motion to dismiss asserting that
22
plaintiff lacked standing due to his failure to list the claim on his bankruptcy schedule, and on plaintiff’s
23
averment that he would retain an attorney, the Court dismissed his original complaint without prejudice.
24
On January 31, 2012, plaintiff reopened his bankruptcy petition and listed the claims he makes in the
25
26
27
28
1
Defendants request that the Court take judicial notice of eight documents related to the
foreclosure and bankruptcy. The Court has already taken judicial notice of the Deed of Trust, Notice
of Default, Trustee Sales, and Bankruptcy Petition of this property. Order Granting Defendants’ Motion
to Dismiss at n.1. [docket 31]. The Court now takes judicial notice of the balance, only for purposes
of the dates of filing. Fed. R. Evid. 201.
2
1
amended complaint, valuing them at $6,441. RJN, Exhibit H at 7. He then filed the amended complaint
2
on February 1, 2012.
3
On February 21, 2012, defendant U.S. Bank National Association filed this motion to dismiss
4
plaintiff’s first amended complaint. The next day co-defendants Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder &
5
Weiss, LLP and Grace Everitt moved to join the motion.2
6
7
DISCUSSION
Defendant argues that plaintiff has no standing to bring these claims because all of his legal and
9
equitable interests in the Property have been placed in a bankruptcy estate. Defs.’ Mot. at 5. The Court
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
agrees. When a bankruptcy petition is filed, an estate is created that consists of “all legal or equitable
11
interests of the debtor in property as of the commencement of the case.” 11 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). “Once
12
an individual declares bankruptcy, any legal or equitable interests he or she had in a particular property
13
belong to the bankruptcy estate, as represented by the bankruptcy trustee. Absent abandonment of an
14
asset, the trustee remains the sole representative of the estate.” Vertkin v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage,
15
No. C 10-00775, 2010 WL 3619798, *2 (N.D. Cal. 2010) (Seeborg, J.). Plaintiff reopened his
16
bankruptcy petition on January 31, 2012, listing the claims at issue here as an asset therein. He then
17
filed the FAC, asserting those claims, on February 1, 2012. The right to bring this action is vested in
18
the bankruptcy estate. Plaintiff can only bring his claim if the bankruptcy trustee has abandoned it.
19
A bankruptcy estate can abandon the property of an estate in three ways. 15 U.S.C. § 554. First,
20
after a noticed motion and hearing, the trustee can formally abandon property “that is burdensome to
21
the estate or that is of inconsequential value and benefit to the estate.” 15 U.S.C. § 554(a). Second, the
22
court may order the trustee to abandon the burdensome or valueless property after a noticed motion and
23
hearing. § 554(b). Third, the trustee can abandon certain property at the closing of the bankruptcy case.
24
§ 554(c).
25
Plaintiff informs the Court that “[t]here has been much communication between the bankruptcy
26
2
27
28
Defendants Barrett Daffin Frappier Treder & Weiss, LLP and Grace Everitt move to join
defendant U.S. Bank’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff has not made any individual allegations against these
defendants. Defendant U.S. Bank’s motion to dismiss presents issues common to all defendants. The
motion to join is GRANTED.
3
1
trustee and Plaintiff’s counsel in full disclosure of the complaint and the details of the claims. Plaintiff
2
has recently been informed by Timothy Hoffman, the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee for the Plaintiff’s
3
re-opened bankruptcy, that he intends to abandon all claims and instructed our office to file a response.”
4
Plf’s. Opp. at 3. Plaintiff states that his office will provide supplemental information to the Court as
5
soon as the claims are abandoned. Id.
As of this date, the bankruptcy trustee has not abandoned plaintiff’s claims, nor has he entered
7
into a written stipulation, approved by the bankruptcy court, allowing plaintiff to proceed with his
8
claims. Plaintiff does not have standing to pursue his claims at this time. See Estate of Spirtos v. One
9
San Bernardino County Superior Court Case Numbered SPR 02211, 443 F.3d 1172, 1175 (9th Cir.
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
6
2006). Given that plaintiff has indicated that the bankruptcy trustee is in the process of abandoning
11
these claims, the Court STAYS this action. Plaintiff is ordered to notify the Court immediately
12
if/when his bankruptcy estate abandons the claims, at which time the Court will reset a hearing
13
on this motion. Similarly, plaintiff is ordered to notify the Court if the bankruptcy trustee
14
declines to abandon the claims. If the bankruptcy estate has taken no action by April 27, 2012,
15
plaintiff is ordered to notify the Court of the status of the claims within the bankruptcy estate.
16
17
IT IS SO ORDERED.
18
19
Dated: March 29, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?