United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fremont Automobile Dealership LLC
Filing
13
ORDER for continuance re 12 Stipulation, filed by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/10/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/27/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Filed10/26/11 Page1 of 3
WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965
JONATHAN T. PECK, #12303 (VA)
RAYMOND T. CHEUNG, SBN 176086
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
San Francisco District Office
350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500
San Francisco, CA 94105-1260
Telephone No. (415) 625-5649
Fax No. (415) 625-5657
raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KURT T. HENDERSHOTT
Chapman & Intrieri, LLP
2236 Mariner Square Drive, Suite 300
Alameda, CA 94501
510/864-3600
510/864-3601 Facsimile
khendershott@chapmanandintrieri.com
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
UNITED STATED EQUAL
EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION,
16
CASE NO. CV 11-04131 CRB
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR CONTINUANCE
Plaintiff,
v.
17
18
FREMONT AUTOMOBILE
DEALERSHIP, LLC dba FREMONT
TOYOTA,
19
Defendant.
20
21
Plaintiff UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
22
(hereinafter “Commission” or “EEOC”) and Defendant FREMONT AUTOMOBILE
23
DEALERSHIP, LLC, dba FREMONT TOYOTA (hereinafter “Fremont Toyota”), through their
24
respective counsel have conducted numerous meet and confers regarding early mediation of the
25
above case. The parties have agreed to utilize the Court’s early ADR program and have filed a
26
stipulation/order requesting that this case be referred to mediation with Jeffrey A. Ross, a respected
27
private mediator with the Court’s ADR program, who has decades of experience litigating the type
28
of employment discrimination issues similar to those in the present case.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EEOC v. Fremont Auto
Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB
1
Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Filed10/26/11 Page2 of 3
The parties jointly request the following continuance to accommodate the schedules and
availability of the selected mediator and individuals necessary to the ADR process in order to
maximize the likelihood of a successful mediation. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit the
following stipulated request to:
1) Continue the deadline for Defendant to file its ANSWER, currently set for October 31, 2011,
by an additional 14 days.
2) Continue all other pending deadlines, including but not limited to the ADR deadline and the
initial Case Management Conference, currently set for December 9, 2011, by an additional
60 days.
10
11
12
Date: October 26, 2011
By:
/s/ Raymond T. Cheung
Raymond T. Cheung
U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT
OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
San Francisco District Office
Date: October 26, 2011
By:
/s/ Kurt T. Hendershott
Kurt T. Hendershott
Chapman & Intrieri, LLP
Attorney for Defendant
Fremont Automobile Dealership, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EEOC v. Fremont Auto
Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB
2
Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12
1
Filed10/26/11 Page3 of 3
ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE
2
ISTRIC
____________________________________
ES D
T
Dated: October 27, 2011
T
TA
C
RT
U
O
S
5
UNIT
ED
JUDGE CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Court Judge
6
7
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
8
J
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
EEOC v. Fremont Auto
Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB
3
A
H
ER
LI
RT
10
. Breyer
arles R
udge Ch
NO
9
R NIA
4
IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Management Conference reset for February 10, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.
FO
3
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?