United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Fremont Automobile Dealership LLC

Filing 13

ORDER for continuance re 12 Stipulation, filed by United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Initial Case Management Conference reset for 2/10/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/27/2011. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Filed10/26/11 Page1 of 3 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO, SBN 084965 JONATHAN T. PECK, #12303 (VA) RAYMOND T. CHEUNG, SBN 176086 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105-1260 Telephone No. (415) 625-5649 Fax No. (415) 625-5657 raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff KURT T. HENDERSHOTT Chapman & Intrieri, LLP 2236 Mariner Square Drive, Suite 300 Alameda, CA 94501 510/864-3600 510/864-3601 Facsimile khendershott@chapmanandintrieri.com 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 UNITED STATED EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, 16 CASE NO. CV 11-04131 CRB STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE Plaintiff, v. 17 18 FREMONT AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIP, LLC dba FREMONT TOYOTA, 19 Defendant. 20 21 Plaintiff UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 22 (hereinafter “Commission” or “EEOC”) and Defendant FREMONT AUTOMOBILE 23 DEALERSHIP, LLC, dba FREMONT TOYOTA (hereinafter “Fremont Toyota”), through their 24 respective counsel have conducted numerous meet and confers regarding early mediation of the 25 above case. The parties have agreed to utilize the Court’s early ADR program and have filed a 26 stipulation/order requesting that this case be referred to mediation with Jeffrey A. Ross, a respected 27 private mediator with the Court’s ADR program, who has decades of experience litigating the type 28 of employment discrimination issues similar to those in the present case. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EEOC v. Fremont Auto Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB 1 Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Filed10/26/11 Page2 of 3 The parties jointly request the following continuance to accommodate the schedules and availability of the selected mediator and individuals necessary to the ADR process in order to maximize the likelihood of a successful mediation. Accordingly, the parties respectfully submit the following stipulated request to: 1) Continue the deadline for Defendant to file its ANSWER, currently set for October 31, 2011, by an additional 14 days. 2) Continue all other pending deadlines, including but not limited to the ADR deadline and the initial Case Management Conference, currently set for December 9, 2011, by an additional 60 days. 10 11 12 Date: October 26, 2011 By: /s/ Raymond T. Cheung Raymond T. Cheung U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION San Francisco District Office Date: October 26, 2011 By: /s/ Kurt T. Hendershott Kurt T. Hendershott Chapman & Intrieri, LLP Attorney for Defendant Fremont Automobile Dealership, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EEOC v. Fremont Auto Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB 2 Case3:11-cv-04131-CRB Document12 1 Filed10/26/11 Page3 of 3 ORDER GRANTING CONTINUANCE 2 ISTRIC ____________________________________ ES D T Dated: October 27, 2011 T TA C RT U O S 5 UNIT ED JUDGE CHARLES R. BREYER United States District Court Judge 6 7 DERED O OR IT IS S 8 J 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EEOC v. Fremont Auto Case No. CV 11-04131 CRB 3 A H ER LI RT 10 . Breyer arles R udge Ch NO 9 R NIA 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Case Management Conference reset for February 10, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. FO 3 N F D IS T IC T O R C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?