H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. Posh Hair Salon Incorporated

Filing 43

ORDER, 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying Scheduling Order filed by H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc.. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 5/6/ 2013 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Jury Trial set for 5/6/2013 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2013 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/13/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Danning Jiang, Esq. (CA BAR No. 196985) LAW OFFICES OF DANNING JIANG 271 North First Street San Jose, California 95113 Tel.: (408) 299-0800 Fax: (408) 299-0300 E-mail: Djiang@jianglawgroup.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. 7 8 9 10 11 12 Donald Barker, (CA BAR No. 145464) Law Offices of Donald M. Barker 2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140 Irvine, CA 92612 E-mail: Lawbarker40@yahoo.com Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Complainant Posh Hair Salon, Inc. 13 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 H & B BEAUTY SUPPLIES, INC., ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Vs. ) ) ) POSH HAIR SALON ) INCORPORATED, and DOES 1-10, ) inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________) CASE NO. CV 11-04142 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Courtroom: #10 Judge: Hon. Susan Illston Action Filed: August 23, 2011 Trial Date: February 4, 2013 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Page 1 1 Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and 2 Defendant and Counter-Complainant Posh Hair Salon Incorporated (“Defendant”), by and 3 through their respective counsel, jointly submit the Stipulation for Order Modifying the 4 Scheduling Order as following: 5 WHEREAS, the Court entered a Scheduling Order on January 25, 2012; 6 WHEREAS, there is a separate action regarding the DOSHA trademark pending in the 7 U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (captioned “DoshaCare, Inc. v. Posh 8 Hair Salon Incorporated,” Central District of California Docket No.: 2:11-CV-01322-GAF- 9 FMO) (hereinafter “DoshaCare Action”). The DoshaCare Action has been ordered to 10 mediation. The mediation has been set for November 29, 2012. The mediation status in the 11 DoshaCare Action could impact the settlement in this action; 12 13 WHEREAS, the parties in this action are willing to engage in further settlement negotiation pending the mediation in the DoshaCare Action; THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by their undersigned counsel, subject to the 14 15 Court’s approval, to modify the dates in the current outstanding Scheduling Order as follows: 16 17 18 ACTION CURRENT DATE REVISED DATE Last day to file dispositive motions November 9, 2012 February 8, 2013 November 26, 2012 February 25, 2013 Last day to file replies December 3, 2012 March 4, 2013 Hearing on dispositive motions December 14, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. March 15, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. Pretrial Conference January 22, 2013 at 3:30 p.m. April 23, 2013 at 3:30 p.m. Trial 20 January 18, 2013 at 3:00 p.m. Last day to file oppositions 19 Further Case Management Conference February 4, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. May 6, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Page 2 1 SO STIPULATED: 2 3 Dated: November 6, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF DANNING JIANG 4 /s/ DANNING JIANG DANNING JIANG, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. 5 6 7 8 Dated: November 7, 2012 LAW OFFICES OF DONALD M. BARKER 9 /S/ DONALD BARKER DONALD BARKER, Esq. Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Complainant Posh Hair Salon, Inc. 10 11 12 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 16 17 18 Dated: __________________ 11/14/12 ___________________________ The Honorable Susan Illston United States District Judge 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER Page 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?