H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. v. Posh Hair Salon Incorporated
Filing
43
ORDER, 42 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Modifying Scheduling Order filed by H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc.. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/23/2013 03:30 PM in Courtroom 10, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Jury Selection set for 5/6/ 2013 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Jury Trial set for 5/6/2013 08:30 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Motion Hearing set for 3/15/2013 09:00 AM before Hon. Susan Illston. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 11/13/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2012)
1
2
3
4
Danning Jiang, Esq. (CA BAR No. 196985)
LAW OFFICES OF DANNING JIANG
271 North First Street
San Jose, California 95113
Tel.: (408) 299-0800
Fax: (408) 299-0300
E-mail: Djiang@jianglawgroup.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc.
7
8
9
10
11
12
Donald Barker, (CA BAR No. 145464)
Law Offices of Donald M. Barker
2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140
Irvine, CA 92612
E-mail: Lawbarker40@yahoo.com
Attorneys for Defendant and Counter-Complainant
Posh Hair Salon, Inc.
13
14
15
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
H & B BEAUTY SUPPLIES, INC.,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
Vs.
)
)
)
POSH HAIR SALON
)
INCORPORATED, and DOES 1-10,
)
inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________)
CASE NO. CV 11-04142 SI
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER MODIFYING
SCHEDULING ORDER
Courtroom: #10
Judge:
Hon. Susan Illston
Action Filed: August 23, 2011
Trial Date:
February 4, 2013
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 1
1
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc. (“Plaintiff”) and
2
Defendant and Counter-Complainant Posh Hair Salon Incorporated (“Defendant”), by and
3
through their respective counsel, jointly submit the Stipulation for Order Modifying the
4
Scheduling Order as following:
5
WHEREAS, the Court entered a Scheduling Order on January 25, 2012;
6
WHEREAS, there is a separate action regarding the DOSHA trademark pending in the
7
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California (captioned “DoshaCare, Inc. v. Posh
8
Hair Salon Incorporated,” Central District of California Docket No.: 2:11-CV-01322-GAF-
9
FMO) (hereinafter “DoshaCare Action”). The DoshaCare Action has been ordered to
10
mediation. The mediation has been set for November 29, 2012. The mediation status in the
11
DoshaCare Action could impact the settlement in this action;
12
13
WHEREAS, the parties in this action are willing to engage in further settlement
negotiation pending the mediation in the DoshaCare Action;
THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, by their undersigned counsel, subject to the
14
15
Court’s approval, to modify the dates in the current outstanding Scheduling Order as follows:
16
17
18
ACTION
CURRENT DATE
REVISED DATE
Last day to file dispositive
motions
November 9, 2012
February 8, 2013
November 26, 2012
February 25, 2013
Last day to file replies
December 3, 2012
March 4, 2013
Hearing on dispositive
motions
December 14, 2012 at 9:00
a.m.
March 15, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
Pretrial Conference
January 22, 2013 at 3:30 p.m.
April 23, 2013 at 3:30 p.m.
Trial
20
January 18, 2013 at 3:00 p.m.
Last day to file oppositions
19
Further Case Management
Conference
February 4, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.
May 6, 2013 at 8:30 a.m.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 2
1
SO STIPULATED:
2
3
Dated: November 6, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF DANNING JIANG
4
/s/ DANNING JIANG
DANNING JIANG, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
H & B Beauty Supplies, Inc.
5
6
7
8
Dated: November 7, 2012
LAW OFFICES OF DONALD M. BARKER
9
/S/ DONALD BARKER
DONALD BARKER, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant and
Counter-Complainant Posh Hair Salon, Inc.
10
11
12
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
18
Dated: __________________
11/14/12
___________________________
The Honorable Susan Illston
United States District Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?