Humboldt Wholesale Inc v. Humboldt Nation Distribution LLC et al

Filing 73

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 72 to Allow Plaintiff to File a First Amended Complaint filed by Humboldt Wholesale Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/23/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/23/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 HUMBOLDT WHOLESALE, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, 13 14 v. Case No.: 11-CV-4144-EMC ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO ALLOW PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 15(A)(2) 15 16 17 HUMBOLDT NATION DISTRIBUTION, LLC, a California limited liability company; HUMBOLDT NUTRIENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER Having considered the parties’ stipulation consenting to Plaintiffs filing a First Amended Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint filed as Exhibit A to the parties’ stipulation on July 13, 2012 is deemed filed as of the date of this Order. 2. Defendant shall have 21 days from the filing of the First Amended Complaint to respond or otherwise plead to Plainitff’s Amended Complaint. 3. The parties’ agreement to stipulate to leave to amend the pleadings shall not limit any party's ability to challenge or otherwise address the merits or treatment of the amended ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 11-CV-4144-EMC 115585/000002/1537937.01 July 23, 2012 Dated: ___________________ RT 6 FO NO n ______________________________________ M. Che Edward Jud EDWARD M. CHEN ge United States District Court Judge 5 7 8 A H ER LI 4 DERED O OR IT IS S R NIA 3 S IT IS SO ORDERED. S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 2 allegations. UNIT ED 1 N D IS T IC T R OF C 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S LEAVE TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT Case No. 11-CV-4144-EMC 115585/000002/1537937.01

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?