Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. MGM Drywall, Inc. et al
Filing
26
ORDER granting 25 MOTION to Continue Plaintiffs' Case Management Statement and Request to Continue Case Management Conference filed by Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, et al. Case Management Conference reset for 10/26/2012 08:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/22/2012. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2012)
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Blake E. Williams, Esq. (SBN 233158)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
5 bwilliams@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 BAY AREA PAINTERS AND TAPERS
PENSION TRUST FUND, et al.
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
MGM DRYWALL, INC., a California
14 Corporation, and MIGUEL GUILLEN
RAMIREZ aka MIGUEL RAMIREZ
15 GUILLEN, an individual,
Case No.: C11-4188 CRB
ORDER
Date:
Time:
Ctrm:
Judge:
August 24, 2012
8:30 a.m.
8, 19th Floor, San Francisco
Honorable Charles R. Breyer
16
Defendants.
17
Plaintiffs herein respectfully submit their Case Management Statement, requesting that the
18 Case Management Conference, currently on calendar for August 24, 2012, be continued for
19 approximately 60 days. Plaintiffs recognize that this Case Management Conference Statement
20 was due on August 17, 2012. Due to a calendaring error, Plaintiffs’ counsel neglected to file this
21 statement on time, and hereby submit this Case Management Conference Statement to the Court
22 with apologies for its tardiness.
23
1.
As the Court’s records will reflect, this action was filed on August 24, 2011.
24 Service on Defendants was effectuated on November 17, 2011, and A Proof of Service of
25 Summons on was filed with the Court on November 21, 2011. Defendants failed to plead or
26 otherwise respond to the lawsuit, and the Clerk entered default as to both Defendants on December
27 16, 2011.
28
2.
The parties have been in almost constant contact to discuss resolution of this
-1PLAINTIFFS’ CMC STATEMENT; REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Case No.: C10-3589 CRB
N:\pdf docs\4188drywall.doc
1 matter. At Defendants request, Plaintiffs prepared a draft Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation
2 (“Stipulation”) providing for a twelve month payment plan relative to all amounts due and owing
3 to Plaintiffs and emailed and mailed said Stipulation Defendants on December 12, 2011. In
4 response, Defendants paid the delinquent contributions, but refused to sign the Stipulation.
5 Defendants thereafter submitted payment in full for the interest and attorneys’ fees and costs
6 incurred through May 8, 2012 in two payments, which were received by Plaintiffs’ counsel on
7 April 16, 2012, and May 15, 2012, respectively
8
3.
Before Plaintiffs can dismiss this matter it is imperative that Plaintiffs have the
9 opportunity to ensure that all contributions due by Defendants have been properly reported and
10 paid. Thus, Plaintiffs have decided to exercise their rights under the Collective Bargaining
11 Agreement and Trust Agreements to conduct and audit of Defendants’ payroll records.
12
4.
The Court continued the previous Case Management Conference to allow time for
13 Defendants to submit to an audit of their payroll records to confirm proper reporting and payment
14 of contributions for the time period December 1, 2010 through the date of inspection, and for
15 Plaintiffs to consider whether to waive all or a portion of the liquidated damages that remain due,
16 or whether Defendants should be liable for the full amount.
17
5.
Since then, Defendants scheduled the audit for August 7-8, 2012. The auditor
18 advised that the audit was conducted as scheduled and is now under review. The report should be
19 completed within two weeks. Plaintiffs offered Defendants a conditional waiver of the liquidated
20 damages that remain due on the condition that Defendants remain current in payment of
21 contributions through May 2013 hours worked. However, Defendants did not timely submit their
22 May 2012 contributions, and are therefore no longer eligible to receive the waiver. Therefore,
23 liquidated damages assessed through October 2011 hours worked are due and owing.
24
6.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Case Management Conference,
25 currently scheduled for August 24, 2012, be continued for 60 days to allow time for the audit to be
26 completed and the parties to discuss payment of liquidated damages.
27
7.
There are still no issues that need to be addressed by the parties at a Case
28 Management Conference. In the interest of conserving costs, as well as the Court’s time and
-2PLAINTIFFS’ CMC STATEMENT; REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Case No.: C10-3589 CRB
N:\pdf docs\4188drywall.doc
1 resources, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court continue the currently scheduled Case
2 Management Conference.
3
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the attorney for the Plaintiffs in the above
4 entitled action, and that the foregoing is true of my own knowledge.
5
Executed this 21st day of July 2012, at San Francisco, California.
SALTZMAN & JOHNSON
LAW CORPORATION
6
7
By:
8
9
/S/
Blake E. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
10 IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
The currently set Case Management Conference is hereby continued to October 26, 2012 at
12 8:30 a.m., and all previously set deadlines and dates related to this case are continued accordingly.
13 Date: August 22, 2012
S
15
RT
U
O
S DISTRICT
TE
C
_________________________________________
TA
14
18
har
Judge C
21
A
H
ER
LI
RT
20
reyer
les R. B
NO
19
R NIA
17
RDE
OO
IT IS S
FO
UNIT
ED
THE HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT RED
COURT JUDGE
16
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3PLAINTIFFS’ CMC STATEMENT; REQUEST TO CONTINUE CMC; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Case No.: C10-3589 CRB
N:\pdf docs\4188drywall.doc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?