Rieger v. American Express Company
Filing
11
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 10/19/2012. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/19/2011)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
Northern District of California
4
5
SCOTT RIEGER
6
No. C 11-04202 MEJ
Plaintiff(s),
v.
7
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING
PLAINTIFF TO FILE
CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM
AMERICAN EXPRESS
8
9
Defendant(s).
_____________________________________/
10
On September 23, 2011, the Court ordered the parties to file a written consent to magistrate
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
judge jurisdiction. Plaintiff Scott Rieger has failed to comply. This civil case was randomly
13
assigned to the undersigned magistrate judge for all purposes including trial. In accordance with 28
14
U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all
15
proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the
16
parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by a magistrate judge may be taken directly to the
17
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other
18
judgment of a district court.
19
You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and
20
disposition. Accordingly, Plaintiff Scott Rieger shall inform the Court, by way of the enclosed form,
21
whether he consents to magistrate judge jurisdiction or requests reassignment to a United States
22
District Judge for trial. The consent/declination form shall be filed by October 27, 2011. Failure to
23
comply with this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 19, 2011
_______________________________
Maria-Elena James
Chief United States Magistrate Judge
1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
6
7
8
No. C 11-04202 MEJ
SCOTT RIEGER
5
Plaintiff(s),
vs.
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Defendant(s).
9
/
10
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party hereby
13
consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in this
14
case, including trial, and order the entry of final judgment, and voluntarily waives the right to
15
proceed before a United States District Judge.
16
17
Dated:_________________________
Signed by:____________________________
18
Counsel for:__________________________
19
20
REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
21
The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United
22
States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition, and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to
23
a United States District Judge.
24
25
Dated:___________________________
Signed by:____________________________
26
Counsel for:__________________________
27
28
2
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
FOR THE
4
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
7
SCOTT RIEGER
8
9
10
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Plaintiff,
v.
AMERICAN EXPRESS
Defendant.
/
12
For the Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
Case Number: 11-04202 MEJ
13
14
15
16
17
18
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on October 19, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
Scott Rieger
2697 Parkside Drive
Fremont, CA 94536
19
20
21
Dated: October 19, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?