White et al v. City of Antioch et al
Filing
12
STIPULATED ORDER STAYING PROCEEDINGS PENDING RESOLUTION OF CRIMINAL PROSECUTIONS re 11 Stipulation filed by Demitrius Anderson, Barry White, Jr.. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 18, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2011)
1
2
3
JIVAKA CANDAPPA, (SBN 225919)
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 700
Oakland, CA 94612
Telephone: (510) 628-0300
Facsimile: (510) 628-0400
4
5
6
Attorney for Plaintiffs BARRY WHITE, JR.,
and DEMITRIUS ANDERSON
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF ANTIOCH, JAMES HYDE, Chief )
of Police, Antioch Police Department, in his )
)
official and individual capacities; ALLAN
CANTANDO, Chief of Police, Antioch Police )
)
Department, in his official and individual
capacities; OFFICER NICHOLAS CUEVAS )
)
(#3920), OFFICER CHRIS WALTERS
)
(#3489), CORPORAL MIKE HULSEY
)
(#2356), CORPORAL KELLY OUIMET
)
(#2031), LIEUTENANT LEONARD
)
ORMAN (#1878), OFFICER MIKE
MELLONE (#4323), DOES 1 through 25, in )
)
their official and individual capacities,
)
Defendants.
)
BARRY WHITE, JR. and DEMITRIUS
ANDERSON,
Case No.: C 11-04221 WHA
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
PENDING RESOLUTION OF CRIMINAL
PROSECUTIONS
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order to Stay Action
White et al. vs. City of Antioch et al.
Case No.: C 11-04221 WHA
-1-
1
Plaintiffs Barry White, Jr. and Demitrius Anderson, and Defendants City of Antioch,
2
James Hyde, Allan Cantando, Nicholas Cuevas, Chris Walters, Mike Hulsey, Kelly Ouimet,
3
Leonard Orman, and Mike Mellone, by and through their respective attorneys of record,
4
hereby stipulate to the following:
1.
5
WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed a civil rights complaint in the United Stated District
6
Court in the Northern District of California on August 26, 2011, arising out of an incident
7
relating to the arrests of Plaintiffs by officers of the Antioch Police Department on August 29,
8
2009;
9
2.
WHEREAS the Contra Costa County District Attorney’s Office initiated
10
criminal proceedings against both Plaintiffs on or about May 24, 2010, in connection with the
11
incident relating to the arrests of Plaintiffs on August 29, 2009;
12
3.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Barry White, Jr. is charged with the following felonies
13
related to that arrest: assault with a deadly weapon upon a peace officer, resisting an executive
14
officer and a firearm enhancement;
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
4.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Demitrius Anderson is charged with the following
misdemeanor related to that arrest: delaying, obstructing or resisting a peace officer;
5.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Barry White’s preliminary hearing in connection with the
criminal charges alleged against him is scheduled to be completed on November 18, 2011;
6.
WHEREAS Plaintiff Demitrius Anderson’s jury trial relating to the criminal
charge alleged against him is scheduled to begin on January 23, 2012;
7.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs intend to invoke their rights pursuant to the Fifth
22
Amendment of the United States Constitution in this civil action until the termination of the
23
criminal prosecutions against them;
24
25
26
27
8.
WHEREAS the success of some or all of the claims against the Defendants in
this civil case may turn on the outcome of the criminal prosecutions against Plaintiffs;
9.
WHEREAS Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants in this civil matter may be
limited and/or barred should either of the Plaintiffs suffer convictions in relation to these
28
Stipulation and Order to Stay Action
White et al. vs. City of Antioch et al.
Case No.: C 11-04221 WHA
-2-
1
pending criminal proceedings;
2
10.
WHEREAS there are many overlapping and intertwined issues between the
3
criminal and civil cases involving the Plaintiffs and going forward on the civil case while the
4
criminal cases are still pending could lead to inconsistent rulings and/or verdicts.
11.
5
6
WHEREFORE, the parties, by and through their respective counsel,
respectfully seek an Order of the Court to:
7
a.
8
b. grant Defendants an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, such
pleading to be filed no later than 20 days after the filing of an order lifting
9
the stay in this action,
10
c.
11
vacate the current Scheduling Order in this case including the December
8th Case Management Conference, and
12
d. set this matter for a case management conference during the week of
13
February 20, 2012, per the availability of the Court.
14
IT IS SO STIPULATED
15
16
stay this case until further Order of the Court,
DATED: November 17, 2011
LAW OFFICE OF JIVAKA CANDAPPA
By:
/s/ Jivaka Candappa
_________________________________________
Jivaka Candappa, Attorney for Plaintiffs,
BARRY WHITE, JR. and DEMITRIUS ANDERSON
DATED: November 17, 2011
MCNAMARA, NEY, BEATTY, SLATTERY,
BORGES & BROTHERS LLP
17
18
19
20
21
By:
22
23
24
25
/././
26
/././
27
/s/ Noah G. Blechman
____________________________________________
James V. Fitzgerald, III
Noah G. Blechman
Attorneys for Defendants
THE CITY OF ANTIOCH, et al.
/././
28
Stipulation and Order to Stay Action
White et al. vs. City of Antioch et al.
Case No.: C 11-04221 WHA
-3-
1
ORDER
2
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation and on a showing of good cause, this case is stayed in
3
all respects until further Order of the Court. Defendants shall file a responsive pleading no later
4
than 20 days after the filing of an Order lifting the stay in this matter. The current Scheduling
5
6
Order in this case, including the December 8th Case Management Conference, is hereby
at 11:00 a.m.
23
vacated, and the matter is set for a Case Management Conference on February ______, 2012.
7
The parties shall file a joint Case Management Conference statement no later than one week
8
prior to the hearing.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
Dated: _____________, 2011
November 18
12
By: ___________________________________
HONORABLE WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Stipulation and Order to Stay Action
White et al. vs. City of Antioch et al.
Case No.: C 11-04221 WHA
-4-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?