Massey v. City of San Mateo et al
Filing
33
ORDER DISMISSING CASESigned by Judge Seeborg on 3/15/2012. (rslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/15/2012)
<![CDATA[
**E-filed 3/15/2012**
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
8
12
13
CARLOS MASSEY,
Plaintiff,
14
15
No. C 11-4222 RS
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION
v.
16
CITY OF SAN MATEO, et al,
17
Defendants.
____________________________________/
18
19
On February 17, 2012, an order entered granting defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss
20
the First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff was advised that unless he filed a brief within 15 days
21
showing cause why leave to amend should be granted, the action would be dismissed with prejudice.
22
The 15 days period has elapsed, and plaintiff has filed no response. Accordingly, this action is
23
dismissed with prejudice.
24
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
Dated: March 15, 2012
27
28
RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
