Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 Stipulation filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/17/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)

Download PDF
5 T RT U O 6 Attorneys for Defendants, S DISTRICT Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America TE C A DERED SO OR ED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTIS IT DIFI AS MO 7 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 16 ER Plaintiff, v. LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Defendants. A H INNOVUS PRIME LLC, 13 14 LI RT 12 re mes Wa Judge Ja NO 11 R NIA 4 FO 3 S 2 CHRISTOPHER J. COX, Bar No. 151650 Email: WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Tel: (650) 802-3000 Fax: (650) 802-3100 UNIT ED 1 C N F Case No. CV11 04223 JW D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS PANASONIC CORPORATION AND PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT 17 Date of Filing: 18 8-26-2011 Hon. James Ware 19 20 By Stipulation and Order entered on October 14, 2011, the time for Defendant 21 Panasonic Corporation of North America (“PNA”) to respond to the initial Complaint filed by 22 Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC (the “Complaint”) was extended to November 21, 2011. Plaintiff 23 has since filed a First Amended Complaint and Second Amended Complaint. 24 By further stipulation, at Plaintiff’s request, Defendant Panasonic Corporation 25 (“Panasonic”) has agreed to waive formal service of the Second Amended Complaint in Japan in 26 exchange for Plaintiff’s consent to an extension of time to allow both Panasonic and PNA to 27 respond at the same time to the Second Amended Complaint. 28 NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 (b), Plaintiff and Defendants, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME Case No. CV11 04223 jw 1 2 Panasonic and PNA, agree to extend Panasonic’s and PNA’s time to respond or otherwise plead January 14, to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, up to and including February 15, 2012. 3 Pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B) counsel for Panasonic and PNA hereby 4 attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory 5 of this document. 6 Dated: November 16, 2011 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 7 8 By: 9 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 10 11 Attorneys for Defendants Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America 12 13 14 /s/ Christopher J. Cox Christopher J. Cox Dated: November 16, 2011 15 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER LLC 16 By: 17 18 /s/ John W. Carpenter John W. Carpenter 12 Metairie Court Metairie, LA 70001-3032 Telephone: (415) 577-0698 19 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME 2 Case No. CV11 04223 JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?