Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc et al
Filing
71
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 Stipulation filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/17/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)
5
T
RT
U
O
6
Attorneys for Defendants,
S DISTRICT
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America TE
C
A
DERED
SO OR ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTIS
IT
DIFI
AS MO
7
8
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
ER
Plaintiff,
v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
A
H
INNOVUS PRIME LLC,
13
14
LI
RT
12
re
mes Wa
Judge Ja
NO
11
R NIA
4
FO
3
S
2
CHRISTOPHER J. COX, Bar No. 151650
Email: chris.cox@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: (650) 802-3000
Fax: (650) 802-3100
UNIT
ED
1
C
N
F
Case No. CV11 04223 JW
D IS T IC T O
R
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS PANASONIC
CORPORATION AND PANASONIC
CORPORATION OF NORTH
AMERICA TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
17
Date of Filing:
18
8-26-2011
Hon. James Ware
19
20
By Stipulation and Order entered on October 14, 2011, the time for Defendant
21
Panasonic Corporation of North America (“PNA”) to respond to the initial Complaint filed by
22
Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC (the “Complaint”) was extended to November 21, 2011. Plaintiff
23
has since filed a First Amended Complaint and Second Amended Complaint.
24
By further stipulation, at Plaintiff’s request, Defendant Panasonic Corporation
25
(“Panasonic”) has agreed to waive formal service of the Second Amended Complaint in Japan in
26
exchange for Plaintiff’s consent to an extension of time to allow both Panasonic and PNA to
27
respond at the same time to the Second Amended Complaint.
28
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 (b), Plaintiff and Defendants,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
Case No. CV11 04223 jw
1
2
Panasonic and PNA, agree to extend Panasonic’s and PNA’s time to respond or otherwise plead
January 14,
to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, up to and including February 15, 2012.
3
Pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B) counsel for Panasonic and PNA hereby
4
attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory
5
of this document.
6
Dated: November 16, 2011
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
7
8
By:
9
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
10
11
Attorneys for Defendants
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic
Corporation of North America
12
13
14
/s/ Christopher J. Cox
Christopher J. Cox
Dated: November 16, 2011
15
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER
LLC
16
By:
17
18
/s/ John W. Carpenter
John W. Carpenter
12 Metairie Court
Metairie, LA 70001-3032
Telephone: (415) 577-0698
19
20
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Innovus Prime LLC
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
2
Case No. CV11 04223 JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?