Innovus Prime, LLC v. LG Electronics, Inc et al

Filing 71

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 67 Stipulation filed by Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/17/11. (sis, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011)

5

T

RT
U
O

6

Attorneys for Defendants,
S DISTRICT
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic Corporation of North America TE
C
A

DERED
SO OR ED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTIS
IT
DIFI
AS MO

7
8
9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15
16

ER

Plaintiff,
v.
LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

A

H

INNOVUS PRIME LLC,

13
14

LI

RT

12

re

mes Wa
Judge Ja

NO

11

R NIA

4

FO

3

S

2

CHRISTOPHER J. COX, Bar No. 151650
Email: [e-mail]
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

UNIT
ED

1

C
N
F
Case No. CV11 04223 JW
D IS T IC T O
R

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANTS PANASONIC
CORPORATION AND PANASONIC
CORPORATION OF NORTH
AMERICA TO RESPOND TO
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

17

Date of Filing:

18

8-26-2011

Hon. James Ware

19
20

By Stipulation and Order entered on October 14, 2011, the time for Defendant

21

Panasonic Corporation of North America (“PNA”) to respond to the initial Complaint filed by

22

Plaintiff Innovus Prime LLC (the “Complaint”) was extended to November 21, 2011. Plaintiff

23

has since filed a First Amended Complaint and Second Amended Complaint.

24

By further stipulation, at Plaintiff’s request, Defendant Panasonic Corporation

25

(“Panasonic”) has agreed to waive formal service of the Second Amended Complaint in Japan in

26

exchange for Plaintiff’s consent to an extension of time to allow both Panasonic and PNA to

27

respond at the same time to the Second Amended Complaint.

28

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 6-1 (b), Plaintiff and Defendants,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

Case No. CV11 04223 jw

1
2

Panasonic and PNA, agree to extend Panasonic’s and PNA’s time to respond or otherwise plead
January 14,
to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, up to and including February 15, 2012.

3

Pursuant to General Order 45, § X(B) counsel for Panasonic and PNA hereby

4

attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatory

5

of this document.

6

Dated: November 16, 2011

WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP

7
8

By:

9

201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Defendants
Panasonic Corporation and Panasonic
Corporation of North America

12
13
14

/s/ Christopher J. Cox
Christopher J. Cox

Dated: November 16, 2011

15

LAW OFFICES OF JOHN W. CARPENTER
LLC

16
By:

17
18

/s/ John W. Carpenter
John W. Carpenter

12 Metairie Court
Metairie, LA 70001-3032
Telephone: [phone]

19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Innovus Prime LLC

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME

2

Case No. CV11 04223 JW