Pezzi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
17
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 12/8/2011.. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 17, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2011: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
LAURA PEZZI,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. C 11-04228 WHA
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
AND VACATING HEARING
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WACHOVIA
MORTGAGE, FSB, WORLD SAVINGS
BANK, FSB, GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS
ASSOCIATION SERVICE COMPANY,
CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE
CORPORATION
Defendants.
/
18
19
On October 4, 2011, this action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On October 27,
20
2011, defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Golden West Savings Association Service
21
Company renoticed their motion to dismiss and accompanying request for judicial notice.
22
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the
23
motion was due November 10. None was filed. Accordingly, pro se plaintiff Laura Pezzi is
24
hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why her claims against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
25
and Golden West Savings Association Service Company should not be dismissed for failure to
26
27
28
1
oppose the motion. Plaintiff Pezzi must file a written response to this order by DECEMBER 8,
2
2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted. The
3
motion hearing previously set for December 1, is VACATED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
Dated: November 17, 2011.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?