Pezzi v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 17

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING Show Cause Response due by 12/8/2011.. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 17, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2011: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (wsn, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LAURA PEZZI, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 No. C 11-04228 WHA Plaintiff, v. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND VACATING HEARING WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, GOLDEN WEST SAVINGS ASSOCIATION SERVICE COMPANY, CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION Defendants. / 18 19 On October 4, 2011, this action was reassigned to the undersigned judge. On October 27, 20 2011, defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Golden West Savings Association Service 21 Company renoticed their motion to dismiss and accompanying request for judicial notice. 22 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non-opposition to the 23 motion was due November 10. None was filed. Accordingly, pro se plaintiff Laura Pezzi is 24 hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why her claims against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 25 and Golden West Savings Association Service Company should not be dismissed for failure to 26 27 28 1 oppose the motion. Plaintiff Pezzi must file a written response to this order by DECEMBER 8, 2 2011. If no response is filed or if good cause is not shown, then the motion may be granted. The 3 motion hearing previously set for December 1, is VACATED. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: November 17, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?