Stamos v. Warden - SVSP
Filing
11
ORDER OF TRANSFER. The Court orders this Petition transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 10/11/2011. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
11
JAMES GEORGE STAMOS,
12
13
14
15
16
No. C-11-4302 TEH (PR)
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER OF TRANSFER
WARDEN, SALINAS VALLEY STATE
PRISON,
Respondent.
/
17
18
Petitioner seeks federal habeas review of a conviction
19
from the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
20
County of Amador, which lies within the venue of the Eastern
21
District of California.
22
incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison in Salinas, County of
23
Monterey, which lies within the venue of this judicial district.
24
See id. § 84(a).
25
See 28 U.S.C. § 84(b).
Petitioner is
Venue in a habeas action is proper in either the district
26
of confinement or the district of conviction, see 28 U.S.C. §
27
2241(d); however, petitions challenging a conviction preferably are
28
1
heard in the district of conviction.
2
(b); Dannenberg v. Ingle, 831 F. Supp. 767, 768 (N.D. Cal. 1993).
3
See Habeas L. R. 2254-3(a) &
Because the County of Amador lies within the Eastern
4
District of California, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a) and Habeas
5
Local Rule 2254-3(b) and in the interest of justice, the Court
6
orders this Petition TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court
7
for the Eastern District of California.
8
9
The Clerk shall transfer this matter and terminate all
pending motions as moot.
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
DATED
10/11/2011
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.11\Stamos-11-4302-habeas-transfer-caed.wpd
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?