Cato v. US. Security Associates

Filing 19

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 12/23/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

13
14

ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

Plaintiff,

11
12

No. C 11-4345 SI

MARK A. CATO,

v.
U.S. SECURITY ASSOCIATES,
Defendant.

/

15
In an order filed November 22, 2011, the Court granted defendant’s motion to dismiss and
16
granted plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint by December 19, 2011. Plaintiff did not file an
17
amended complaint. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), this case is
18
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute.
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
Dated: December 23, 2011
23
24
25
26
27
28

SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge