Faboozi v. Stubhub, Inc. et al

Filing 28

FILED IN ERROR - PLEASE SEE #30

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Gary A. Nye, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 126104)
David R. Ginsburg, Esq. (Cal. Bar No. 210900)
ROXBOROUGH, POMERANCE, NYE & ADREANI, LLP
5820 Canoga Avenue, Suite 250
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS AND
INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and
AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS AND )
)
INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and
AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY, INC., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Case No. C 11-04794 EMC
[Assigned to the
Honorable Edward M. Chen]
STIPULATION TO ENLARGE TIME FOR
FILING G&G/ASC’S RESPONSE TO
GOVERNMENT’S COMPLAINT;
[PROPOSED] ORDER

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Filing
G&G/ASC’s Response to Government’s Complaint

C 11-04794 EMC

1

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Defendants Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds and Insurance

2

Agency, Inc. and American Surety Company, Inc. (“G&G/ASC”), on the one hand, and Plaintiff

3

United States of America (“United States”), on the other hand, by and through their respective

4

counsel of record, bring this administrative motion by stipulation, and stipulate and agree as

5

follows:

6

1.

On September 27, 2011, the United States filed its complaint, dkt. 1.

7

2.

On October 3, 2011, the case was reassigned to the Honorable Edward M. Chen,

3.

On October 13, 2011, the case was ordered related to Case No. C09-4029 EMC

8
9

dkt. 7.

10

(United States of America vs. Gonzales & Gonzales Bonds and Insurance Agency, Inc. and

11

American Surety Company, Inc.), dkt. 8.

12

4.

In Case No. C09-4029 EMC, the Court entered an Order on November 22, 2011,

13

pursuant to stipulation of the parties, to enlarge the time for the United States to respond to

14

G&G/ASC’s first amended counterclaim to December 30, 2011.

15
16
17
18

5.

Per FED. R. CIV. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(ii), G&G/ASC has until December 6, 2011, to file

a response to the United States’ complaint in the instant case.
6.

The parties stipulate to enlarge the time for G&G/ASC to respond to the United

States’ complaint to December 30, 2011.

19
20

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

21

Dated: December 1, 2011

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TONY WEST
Assistant Attorney General
MELINDA HAAG
United States Attorney

ROXBOROUGH, POMERANCE, NYE & ADREANI, LLP

/s/ John J. Siemietkowski__________
J. CHRISTOPHER KOHN
RUTH A. HARVEY
E. KATHLEEN SHAHAN
(D.C. Bar No. 267872)

/s/ Gary A. Nye_______
GARY A. NYE
DAVID R. GINSBURG
Attorneys for Defendants
GONZALES & GONZALES BONDS AND
2

Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Filing
G&G/ASC’s Response to Government’s Complaint

C 11-04794 EMC

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

JOHN J. SIEMIETKOWSKI
(PA Bar. No. 50346)
FRANCES M. MCLAUGHLIN
(FL Bar No. 0256640)
Trial Attorneys
Civil Division, Commercial Litigation
Branch
P.O. Box 875, Ben Franklin Station
Washington, DC 20044-0875
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. and AMERICAN
SURETY COMPANY, INC.

8
9

Attorneys for the United States of
America

10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED:

16

ORD
_________________T IS SO
I

17

Edward M. Chen
U.S. District Judge

21

ER

Chen

LI

dw
Judge E

A

H

20

RT

19

ard M.

NO

18

ERED

R NIA

UNIT
ED

15

RT
U
O

S

14

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

FO

13

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Filing
G&G/ASC’s Response to Government’s Complaint

C 11-04794 EMC