Crosthwaite et al v. Fremont Paving Company, Inc. et al
Filing
56
ORDER ADOPTING 533 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE 33 and 49 . Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on December 7, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Plaintiffs,
No. C 11-04417 JSW
v.
FREMONT PAVING, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION ON
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
DEFAULT JUDGMENT
14
15
This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of the Report and
16
Recommendation (“Report”) prepared by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, in which he
17
recommends that the Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment
18
against Defendant Brittany Danielle Lebon. The deadline for filing objections to the Report has
19
passed, and neither party has filed objections.
20
The Court has considered the Report, relevant legal authority, and the record in this
21
case. The Court finds the Report thorough and well reasoned and adopts it in every respect.
22
Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment, and Plaintiffs are hereby
23
awarded: (1) $277,672.46 in unpaid contributions, liquidated damages and interest through
24
August 28, 2012; (2) $25,019.58 in post-litigation late paid contributions, liquidated damages
25
and interest; (3) $23, 094.28 in pre-litigation late paid contributions, liquidates damages and
26
interest; (4) $30,226.50 in attorneys’ fees; and (6) $1,444.50 in costs.
27
28
1
The Court shall issue a separate judgment, and the Clerk shall close the file.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
4
Dated: December 7, 2012
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?