Crosthwaite et al v. Fremont Paving Company, Inc. et al
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING 61 Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Stipulated Judgment Against Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc. Only. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/22/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509)
Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607)
2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110
3 San Francisco, CA 94104
(415) 882-7900
4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile
mstafford@sjlawcorp.com
5 mkaplan@sjlawcorp.com
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al.
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
Case No.: C11-4417-JSW
v.
FREMONT PAVING COMPANY, INC., a
California Corporation, et al.,
14
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF
SATISFACTION OF STIPULATED
JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT
FREMONT PAVING COMPANY, INC.
ONLY
[PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON
Defendants.
15
16
1.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that the Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation
17 against Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc., in the above-captioned action has been
18 satisfied in full.
19
2.
The names and address of the judgment creditors are: F.G. Crosthwaite, et al., c/o
20 Michele R. Stafford, Esq., Saltzman & Johnson Law Corporation, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite
21 2110, San Francisco, California 94104.
22
3.
The names and addresses of the judgment debtors are as follows:
23
(a)
Fremont Paving Company, Inc., 38370 Cedar Blvd., Newark, CA 94560;
24
(b)
Ellen Marie Lebon, 4312 Dorsey Avenue, Fremont, CA 94536;
25
(c)
Donald Alan Lebon, 5214 Theresa Way, Livermore, CA 94550;
26
4.
The Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation against Fremont Paving Company, Inc. was
27 entered on September 17, 2012.
28
5.
Abstracts of Judgment were recorded, as follows:
-1ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT
Case No.: C11-4417-JSW
P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Fremont Paving Company Inc\Pleadings\C11-4417-JSW - Satisfaction of Judgment 021513.DOC
February 22
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?