Crosthwaite et al v. Fremont Paving Company, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER GRANTING 61 Acknowledgment of Satisfaction of Stipulated Judgment Against Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc. Only. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 2/22/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2013)

Download PDF
1 Michele R. Stafford, Esq. (SBN 172509) Muriel B. Kaplan, Esq. (SBN 124607) 2 SALTZMAN & JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2110 3 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 882-7900 4 (415) 882-9287 – Facsimile 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al. Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 Case No.: C11-4417-JSW v. FREMONT PAVING COMPANY, INC., a California Corporation, et al., 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF STIPULATED JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT FREMONT PAVING COMPANY, INC. ONLY [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON Defendants. 15 16 1. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that the Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation 17 against Defendant Fremont Paving Company, Inc., in the above-captioned action has been 18 satisfied in full. 19 2. The names and address of the judgment creditors are: F.G. Crosthwaite, et al., c/o 20 Michele R. Stafford, Esq., Saltzman & Johnson Law Corporation, 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 21 2110, San Francisco, California 94104. 22 3. The names and addresses of the judgment debtors are as follows: 23 (a) Fremont Paving Company, Inc., 38370 Cedar Blvd., Newark, CA 94560; 24 (b) Ellen Marie Lebon, 4312 Dorsey Avenue, Fremont, CA 94536; 25 (c) Donald Alan Lebon, 5214 Theresa Way, Livermore, CA 94550; 26 4. The Judgment Pursuant to Stipulation against Fremont Paving Company, Inc. was 27 entered on September 17, 2012. 28 5. Abstracts of Judgment were recorded, as follows: -1ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT Case No.: C11-4417-JSW P:\CLIENTS\OE3CL\Fremont Paving Company Inc\Pleadings\C11-4417-JSW - Satisfaction of Judgment 021513.DOC February 22

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?