Shirvanian v. Kohl's Corporation et al
Filing
23
ORDER by Judge Charles R. Breyer granting Motion to Consolidate Cases C-11-4427 and C-12-0119 with C-11-2320CRB for all purposes. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/22/12. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)
Case3:11-cv-02320-CRB Document26 Filed02/22/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
No. C 11-02320 CRB
RHONDA WHITTENBURG, ET. AL.,
ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES
Plaintiffs,
v.
KOHLS CORPORATION, ET. AL.,
15
Defendants.
/
16
17
Defendant Kohl’s Corporation (“Defendant”) filed a Motion to Consolidate
18
Burdewick v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., No. 12-119, and Shirvanian v. Kohl’s Corp.,
19
No. 11-4427, with this action. Dkt. 22. Defendant filed Notice of this Motion in both of
20
these cases. See Dkt. 21 in case No. 11-4427, Dkt. 16 in case No. 12-119. Plaintiff
21
Whittenburg filed a Notice of Non-Opposition to the Motion. Dkt. 23. Plaintiff Shirvanian
22
also filed a Notice of Non-Opposition in case No. 11-4427. Dkt. 22. Plaintiff Burdewick has
23
not filed anything in response to the Notice.
24
25
26
27
28
The Court, having carefully considering the papers and evidence filed by the parties,
hereby ORDERS as follows:
(1) Pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b), the hearing scheduled for Friday, February 24 is
VACATED;
(2) Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED;
Case3:11-cv-02320-CRB Document26 Filed02/22/12 Page2 of 2
1
2
(3) Burdewick v. Kohl’s Department Stores, Inc., No. 12-119, and Shirvanian v.
Kohl’s Corp., No. 11-4427, are hereby consolidated with this case for all purposes.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated: February 22, 2012
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?