Evans v. Cate et al
Filing
8
ORDER OF DISMISSAL; VACATING ORDER OF SERVICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 12/29/11. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Certificate of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/29/2011)
1
2
*E-Filed 12/29/11*
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9
10
PHILLIP T. EVANS,
Plaintiff,
11
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
No. C 11-4432 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL;
v.
12
VACATING ORDER OF SERVICE
13
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
14
Defendants.
/
15
This is a federal civil rights action filed by a pro se state prisoner pursuant to 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. Pursuant to petitioner’s motion of voluntary dismissal (Docket No. 6), this
18
action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (“[A]n action may be dismissed by the
19
plaintiff without order of the court . . . by filing a notice of dismissal.”); Hamilton v.
20
Shearson-Lehman American Exp. Inc., 813 F.2d 1532, 1534–1536 (9th Cir. 1987) (Rule
21
41(a)(1)(I) does not require leave of court to dismiss the action). The dismissal is without
22
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1). The order of service (Docket No. 5) is VACATED.
23
The Clerk shall terminate Docket No. 6, enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the
24
file.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
DATED: December 29, 2011
27
28
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
No. C 11-04432 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?