Dykes v. Ayers

Filing 64

ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT 62 . (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 8/24/2018)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 ERNEST EDWARD DYKES, Case No. 11-cv-04454-SI Petitioner, 5 v. ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S REQUEST TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE JOINT STATEMENT 6 7 RON DAVIS, Warden of California State Prison at San Quentin, 8 Respondent. Re: Dkt. No. 62 9 Petitioner has filed a second request to extend by 60 days the time to file a joint statement 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 10 outlining a litigation schedule for the adjudication of his capital habeas petition. Petitioner asserts 12 that he needs additional time so that he may pursue a proposed settlement of his case. Petitioner 13 notes that he is awaiting third-party input relating to claim 1 of his petition, which alleges that the 14 death penalty is disproportionate to his culpability. 15 Respondent opposes petitioner’s request. He asserts that the resolution of the habeas 16 petition has already been significantly delayed, that petitioner has declined to work with 17 respondent on a joint statement and the nature of the settlement sought by petitioner is unclear. 18 Respondent further notes that because resolution of claim 1 has been stayed by this Court, the 19 parties may proceed to resolve the remainder of petitioner’s claims. Finally, respondent requests 20 that if this Court were inclined to grant an extension, to do so only until September 10, 2018, as 21 respondent’s counsel will be on leave from September 17 through October 15, 2018. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed the parties’ contentions, the Court grants an extension until September 10, 2018 for the filing of a joint statement. No further extensions are anticipated. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 24, 2018 ______________________________________ SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?