Twitter, Inc. v. Twittad, LLC
Filing
7
CONSENT to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Wakefield, Jedediah) (Filed on 10/3/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058)
jwakefield@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
555 California Street, 12th Floor
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 875-2300
Facsimile: (415) 281-1350
KAREN WEBB (CSB NO. 233370)
kwebb@fenwick.com
FENWICK & WEST LLP
801 California Street
Mountain View, California 94041
Telephone: (650) 988-8500
Facsimile: (650) 938-5200
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TWITTER, INC.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware Corporation,
CASE NO. No. 3: 2011 cv 04480
14
15
16
Plaintiff,
v.
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
TWITTAD, LLC, an Iowa limited liability
company,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the
undersigned party hereby voluntarily consents to have the assigned United States Magistrate
Judge, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, conduct any and all further proceedings in the case,
including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken
directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
26
27
28
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE
A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
1
CASE NO. 3:2011 CV 04480
1
Dated:
October 3, 2011
FENWICK & WEST LLP
2
3
By:
4
/s/ Jedediah Wakefield
Jedediah Wakefield
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TWITTER, INC.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SAN FRANCISCO
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
F ENWICK & W EST LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE
A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
CASE NO. 3:2011 CV 04480
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?