Twitter, Inc. v. Twittad, LLC

Filing 7

CONSENT to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Twitter, Inc.. (Wakefield, Jedediah) (Filed on 10/3/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 KAREN WEBB (CSB NO. 233370) kwebb@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 801 California Street Mountain View, California 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Plaintiff TWITTER, INC. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TWITTER, INC., a Delaware Corporation, CASE NO. No. 3: 2011 cv 04480 14 15 16 Plaintiff, v. CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE TWITTAD, LLC, an Iowa limited liability company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of Title 28, U.S.C. Section 636(c), the undersigned party hereby voluntarily consents to have the assigned United States Magistrate Judge, Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte, conduct any and all further proceedings in the case, including trial, and order the entry of a final judgment. Appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 26 27 28 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 1 CASE NO. 3:2011 CV 04480 1 Dated: October 3, 2011 FENWICK & WEST LLP 2 3 By: 4 /s/ Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield Attorneys for Plaintiff TWITTER, INC. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 SAN FRANCISCO ATTORNEYS AT LAW F ENWICK & W EST LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 CASE NO. 3:2011 CV 04480

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?