American Express,et al .v Linda Ann Wright

Filing 33

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY by Hon. William Alsup denying 31 Motion to Stay.(whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/12/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
AMERICAN EXPRESS, ET AL,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO STAY

v.
LINDA ANN WRIGHT,
Defendant.
/

15
16

No. C 11-04492 WHA

Defendant Linda Ann Wright has filed a “motion to stay hearing pending appeal.” The

17

motion is improperly noticed and not in compliance with the Civil and Local Rules. Pursuant to

18

Civil Local Rule 7-2, “all motions must be filed, served and noticed in writing on the motion

19

calendar of the assigned Judge for hearing not less than 35 days after service of the motion.” All

20

filings must comply with the Civil Local Rules. Furthermore, defendant Wright does not provide

21

any factual basis or make any legal argument in support of her motion to stay. Thus, the motion

22

to stay is hereby DENIED.

23
24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26
27
28

Dated: November 12, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE