LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al
Filing
471
ORDER SETTING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF re (145 in 3:12-cv-06360-WHO) MOTION for Hearing and (469 in 3:11-cv-04494-WHO) MOTION for Hearing. Case Management Statement due by 4/28/2015. Further Case Management Conference set for 5/5/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 04/21/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2015)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-04494-WHO
Plaintiffs,
5
v.
6
7
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Re: Dkt. No. 469
8
9
LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al.,
10
Plaintiffs,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER SETTING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE;
ADDRESSING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
Case No. 12-cv-6360-WHO
v.
12
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff LifeScan has filed an administrative motion requesting a case management
16
conference to address the management of the above-captioned cases. Dkt. No. 469. LifeScan also
17
seeks leave to file a summary judgment motion on defendants’ antitrust claims and to schedule its
18
Lanham Act claims to proceed along with its patent claims. Defendants filed a response and
19
opposition. Dkt. No. 470.
20
I will address the parties’ proposals at a case management conference on May 5, 2015 at
21
2:00 pm. The parties shall file a joint case management conference statement by April 28, 2015 if
22
they wish to bring additional material to my attention in advance of the May 5 case management
23
conference.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 21, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?