LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al

Filing 498

ORDER re 495 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 490 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/19/2016. Replies due by 2/3/2016. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al., Case No. 11-cv-04494-WHO Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION Re: Dkt. No. 495 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Defendants oppose Lifescan’s request to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for 13 summary judgment. Each party offered a compromise modified schedule that was close to the 14 other’s. Given the impending need for Lifescan to file its opposition, absent court order, I 15 ORDER that plaintiffs’ response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment be filed on or 16 before January 19, 2016. The reply shall be filed by February 3, 2016, and the hearing is set for 17 February 17, 2016. The parties shall cooperate in setting any necessary depositions in sufficient 18 time so that they comply with the amended briefing schedule. 19 Lifescan also asks that I preclude Dr. Wang and any other expert for defendants from 20 making a further expert report on validity. Defendants did not respond to this request. If 21 defendants oppose it, they should file a statement of no more than two pages by December 3, 22 2015, explaining why and addressing plaintiffs’ concern regarding piecemeal expert discovery. I 23 will then decide whether to modify this Order in any way. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?