LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. v. Shasta Technologies, LLC et al
Filing
498
ORDER re 495 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 490 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Responses due by 1/19/2016. Replies due by 2/3/2016. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2016 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 11/30/2015. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD., et al.,
Case No. 11-cv-04494-WHO
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
SHASTA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS'
SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION
Re: Dkt. No. 495
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Defendants oppose Lifescan’s request to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for
13
summary judgment. Each party offered a compromise modified schedule that was close to the
14
other’s. Given the impending need for Lifescan to file its opposition, absent court order, I
15
ORDER that plaintiffs’ response to defendants’ motion for summary judgment be filed on or
16
before January 19, 2016. The reply shall be filed by February 3, 2016, and the hearing is set for
17
February 17, 2016. The parties shall cooperate in setting any necessary depositions in sufficient
18
time so that they comply with the amended briefing schedule.
19
Lifescan also asks that I preclude Dr. Wang and any other expert for defendants from
20
making a further expert report on validity. Defendants did not respond to this request. If
21
defendants oppose it, they should file a statement of no more than two pages by December 3,
22
2015, explaining why and addressing plaintiffs’ concern regarding piecemeal expert discovery. I
23
will then decide whether to modify this Order in any way.
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 30, 2015
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?