Ruane-Gonzales v. Apple Inc. et al

Filing 21

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO ANSWER AND RESETTING CMC re 17 Stipulation filed by HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 6/22/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/29/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/27/11. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 RAOUL D. KENNEDY (STATE BAR NO. 40892) Raoul.Kennedy@skadden.com 2 RICHARD S. HORVATH, JR. (STATE BAR NO. 254681) Richard.Horvath@skadden.com 3 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 525 University Avenue, Suite 1100 4 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 5 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 6 PAUL M. ECKLES (STATE BAR NO. 181156) Paul.Eckles@skadden.com 7 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 4 Times Square 8 New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 735-3000 9 Facsimile: (212) 735-2000 10 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C. 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 EUGENIA RUANE-GONZALES, Individually and on Behalf of All Others 15 Similarly Situated, 16 17 Plaintiff, vs. APPLE INC.; HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC.; HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, 19 INC.; MACMILLAN PUBLISHERS, INC.; PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC.; and SIMON 20 & SCHUSTER, INC., 18 21 Defendants. 22 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND (2) CASE COORDINATION 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC 1 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING (1) EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT AND (2) CASE COORDINATION WHEREAS, there have been multiple actions related to the above-captioned action 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 filed in both the Northern District of California and the Southern District of New York (the “Actions”); WHEREAS, on September 9, 2011, the court in the New York Actions entered a stipulation and order providing that the time for defendants Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C. (incorrectly sued as “HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.”), Holtzbrinck Publishers, LLC d/b/a Macmillan (incorrectly sued as Macmillan Publishers, Inc.), Penguin Group (USA) Inc., Simon & Schuster, Inc., and Apple, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaints in the New York Actions would be enlarged to the 60th day after the Actions have been consolidated in a single forum and a consolidated amended complaint has been filed (or lead plaintiffs’ counsel has announced by filed notice that it will not be filing a consolidated amended complaint); WHEREAS, on October 3, 2011, the parties have filed a stipulation providing that Defendants’ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint in this action would be enlarged until December 15, 2011, and without prejudice to Defendants seeking a further enlargement of the time to answer, move, or otherwise respond; WHEREAS, on October 13, 2011, the Court related the above-captioned action to Petru, et. al. v. Apple, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:11-03892 (N. D. Cal.); WHEREAS, pursuant to the Clerk’s Notice dated November 2, 2011, the Initial Case Management Conference in the above-captioned action is scheduled for January 6, 2012; WHEREAS, on December 9, 2011, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the “JPML”) issued an order pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to transfer Petru, et. al. v. Apple, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:11-03892 and Diamond, et al. v. Apple, Inc., et al., C.A. No. 3:11-03954, currently pending in the Northern District of California, to the Southern District of New York and assign them to the Honorable Denise L. Cote for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC 1 with the actions already pending in the Southern District of New York, In re Electronic Books 2 Antitrust Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2293 (the “Consolidated New York Actions”); 3 WHEREAS, on December 9, 2011, counsel, who purported to act on behalf of 4 plaintiffs in ten of the eleven Actions filed in this Court, sent a letter to Judge Cote regarding case 5 administration of the Actions; 6 WHEREAS, lead plaintiffs’ counsel has not yet been appointed in the Consolidated 7 New York Actions; 8 WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that the remaining Actions currently pending in 9 this Court will be transferred to Judge Cote for coordinated and consolidated pretrial proceedings 10 with the Consolidated New York Actions; 11 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that the response date in this action should not 12 come prior to the response date stipulated to in the Consolidated New York Actions; 13 WHEREAS, the parties have agreed that further case administration should take 14 place in connection with the Consolidated New York Actions; 15 WHEREAS, the parties agree that submission of this Stipulation should be without 16 prejudice to any of Plaintiff’s claims or Defendants’ defenses; 17 WHEREAS, unless otherwise provided for herein, this Stipulation will not modify 18 the schedule of this case; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and 20 between Plaintiff and Defendants, as follows: 21 1. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1, 6-2 and 7-12, Defendants’ time to answer, 22 move, or otherwise respond to the complaint is hereby extended to the 60th day after a 23 consolidated amended complaint has been filed in the Consolidated New York Actions (or lead 24 plaintiffs’ counsel has announced by filed notice that it will not be filing a consolidated amended 25 complaint); 26 2. Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 16-2 and 7-12, the parties hereby stipulate that 27 the Initial Case Management Conference with this Court scheduled for January 6, 2011, should be 28 taken off calendar, as well as all dates required under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC 1 related to that Initial Case Management Conference, without prejudice to Plaintiff’s and 2 Defendants’ positions as to the dates on which these events should occur in the Consolidated New 3 York Actions; 4 3. Further case adminsitration, including the negotiation of any brief scheduling 5 beyond the time for Defendants’ time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint and 6 any pre-trial conferences governed by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16 and 26, shall occur in 7 connection with the Consolidated New York Actions; 8 4. If any of the Defendants that are a party to this Stipulation responds to a 9 complaint in any of the Actions prior to the time provided in this Stipulation, Defendants will 10 respond to the complaint in this action at the same time; 11 5. None of Plaintiff’s claims or Defendants’ defenses are prejudiced or waived 12 by its submission of this Stipulation; and 13 6. This stipulation is without prejudice to the right of any party to seek a further 14 adjustment to any of the dates contained in this stipulation based on future developments 15 DATED: December 14, 2011 16 SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP 17 18 By: /s/ Raoul D. Kennedy RAOUL D. KENNEDY 19 20 21 525 University Ave., Suite 1100 Palo Alto, California 94301 Telephone: (650) 470-4500 Facsimile: (650) 470-4570 22 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS L.L.C. 23 I, Raoul D. Kennedy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 24 Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Regarding: (1) Extending Time to Respond to the Complaint and (2) Case Coordination. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that each of the 25 following signatories has concurred in this filing. 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC 1 SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 2 3 By: /s/ James Donato JAMES DONATO 4 5 6 Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 616-1100 Facsimile: (415) 616-1199 7 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC. 8 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 9 10 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Samuel R. Miller SAMUEL R. MILLER 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 772-1200 Facsimile: (415) 772-7400 14 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant HOLTZBRINCK PUBLISHERS, LLC D/B/A MACMILLAN 15 16 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 17 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ Reginald D. Steer REGINALD D. STEER 580 California Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94104-1036 Telephone: (415) 765-9520 Facsimile: (415) 765-9501 22 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant PENGUIN GROUP (USA) INC. 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC 1 WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP 2 3 By: /s/ Gregory D. Hull GREGORY D. HULL 4 201 Redwood Shores Parkway Redwood Shores, California 94065 Telephone: (650) 802-3000 Facsimile: (650) 802-3100 5 6 7 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant SIMON & SCHUSTER, INC. 8 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP 9 10 By: 11 12 /s/ Daniel S. Floyd DANIEL S. FLOYD 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, CA 90071-3197 Telephone: (213) 229-7148 Facsimile: (213) 229-7520 13 14 Attorneys for Specially Appearing Defendant APPLE INC. 15 16 SHULMAN LAW 17 18 By: /s/ Harry Shulman HARRY SHULMAN 19 44 Montgomery St. Suite 3830 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 901-0505 Facsimile: (866) 422-4859 20 21 22 Attorneys for Plaintiff 23 AS MO NO C ard M. dge Edw 5 u 28 R NIA UNIT ED S RT U O PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. The CMC is reset to 6/29/12 at 9:00 a.m. 24 12/27 S DISTRICT A joint CMC statement shall be filed by Dated: _______________, 2011 TE C 6/22/12. TA 25 By: Hon. Edward M. Chen 26 U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE DERED SO OR ED 27 IT IS DIFI H ER LI J STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME A RT FO hen C CASE NO. 3:11-CV-04500-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?