Colucci et al v. ZonePerfect Nutrition Company

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER: Defendant shall have until March 30, 2012, to file a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; Plaintiffs shall have until April 27, 2012, to file an Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; Defenda nt shall have until May 11, 2012, to Reply to the Plaintiffs Opposition; Defendant shall notice a hearing on its Motion to Dismiss for May 25, 2012; The Case Management Conference shall be held on June 22, 2012, 10:00 AM in Courtroom 1, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Samuel Conti. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/13/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Elizabeth L. Deeley (SBN 230798) elizabeth.deeley@kirkland.com KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 555 California Street San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 439-1400 Facsimile: (415) 439-1500 Attorneys for Defendant ZONEPERFECT NUTRITION COMPANY 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 JAMES COLUCCI and KIMBERLY S. SETHAVANISH, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiffs, vs. ZONEPERFECT NUTRITION COMPANY, Defendant. 16 17 ) CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC ) ) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint in the above-captioned case on or about September 14, 2011; WHEREAS, on or about November 30, 2011, this case was reassigned to the Honorable Samuel Conti; WHEREAS, in response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss filed February 10, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on March 2, 2012; 7 WHEREAS, the parties anticipate that Defendant will file another Motion to Dismiss, and 8 that this motion will be long and complex—raising inter alia issues of federal regulatory policy, 9 federal preemption, and matters of statutory application under California—such that the parties agree 10 that, in accordance with the Commentary to Local Rule 7-2, an extended briefing schedule will best 11 allow the parties to adequately and appropriately present the relevant issues to the Court; 12 WHEREAS, the parties further agree that, particularly as this case is a putative class action 13 and Defendant’s motion is potentially dispositive of this case, it would best conserve the resources of 14 the parties and the Court to postpone the initial Case Management Conference until after the Court 15 rules on Defendant’s forthcoming Motion to Dismiss, which will best allow the parties to assess the 16 appropriate scope and timing of further proceedings in this case for presentation to the Court; 17 WHEREAS, on September 30, November 2, November 12, 2011, and December 16, 2011 18 the parties entered into stipulations to extend the time for the Defendant to answer, move, or 19 otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint and reschedule the Case Management Conference, now 20 set for April 6, 2012; 21 22 23 24 WHEREAS, since the Plaintiffs filed the Amended Complaint on March 2, 2012, neither the Plaintiffs nor the Defendant have sought a stipulation or an extension; and WHEREAS, the parties having confirmed the availability of June 22, 2012 as an available date on the Court’s calendar for a Case Management Conference; 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 1 CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC 1 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the parties, through their counsel, that the 2 parties shall adhere to the following schedule for the briefing of the Defendant’s expected motion, 3 the Case Management Conference, and related deadlines: 4 (i) Defendant shall have until March 30, 2012, to file a Motion to Dismiss the First 5 Amended Complaint; 6 (ii) Plaintiffs shall have until April 27, 2012, to file an Opposition to the Motion to 7 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint; 8 (iii) Defendant shall have until May 11, 2012, to Reply to the Plaintiffs’ Opposition; 9 (iv) Defendant shall notice a hearing on its Motion to Dismiss for May 25, 2012; 10 (v) The Case Management Conference shall be held on June 22, 2012, or such later time 11 as is convenient for the Court, with the parties to file one Joint Case Management 12 Statement seven days prior to the conference. 13 IT IS SO STIPULATED. Respectfully submitted, 14 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 15 16 By: /s/ Elizabeth L. Deeley DATED: March 9, 2012 Elizabeth L. Deeley 17 Attorneys for Defendant ZONEPERFECT NUTRITION COMPANY 18 19 LAW OFFICE OF JANET LINDNER SPIELBERG 20 By: /s/ Janet Lindner Spielberg DATED: March 9, 2012 ED ORDER onti Judge S H ER LI RT 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JAMES COLUCCI and KIMBERLY S. SETHAVANISH FO amuel C NO 24 O IT IS S R NIA S UNIT ED 23 Janet Lindner Spielberg1 RT U O 22 ISTRIC ES D TC AT T A 21 N F D IS T IC T O R C 1 27 28 I, Elizabeth L. Deeley, am the ECF user whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Deadlines. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that the following attorneys have concurred in this filing: Janet Lindner Spielberg, counsel for Plaintiffs, James Colucci and Kimberley S. Sethavanish. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 2 CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC 1 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 4 DATED: ______________, 2012 _____________________________________ The Honorable Samuel Conti 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINES 3 CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 The undersigned hereby certify that all counsel of record who have consented to electronic 3 service are being served with a copy of the attached STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 4 EXTENDING DEADLINES via the CM/ECF system on March 9, 2012. 5 6 DATED: March 9, 2012 By: /s/ Elizabeth L. Deeley Elizabeth Deeley 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 CASE NO. 11-CV-04561 SC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?