Canadian National Railway Company v. Phoenix Logistics, Inc.
Filing
17
ORDER re 16 telephonic appearance, filed by Canadian National Railway Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)
John K. Fiorilla
856.914.2054
jfiorilla@capehart.com
March 12, 2012
VIA ELECTRONIC FILING
Hon. Edward M. Chen, U.S.D.J.
United States Court House
Courtroom 5- 17th Floor
450 Golden Gate Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94102
Re:
Canadian National Railway Company v. Phoenix Logistics, Inc.
Case No. cv-11-4589 (EMC)
Our File #0489.13104
Dear Judge Chen:
This firm represents the plaintiff Canadian National Railway in the above captioned
matter.
On March 9, 2012, we received a telephone call from John Saul, Esq., brother of Fred
Saul, Registered Agent of defendant, Phoenix Logistics, Inc., acknowledging receipt of the
copies of the Case Management Scheduling Order and the Clerkâs Notice Continuing Motion
Hearing #9 to 4/13/12 at 1:30 p.m.
John Saul, Esq. advised that Phoenix Logistics, Inc, has been out of business for several
months. There are no assets available to us and there are several judgments against Phoeix. He
stated that Fred Saul will not be taking any action or responding to our Motion for Default
Judgment scheduled as stated above.
I respectfully request that the Court permit me to appear telephonically at the motion
hearing in this matter.
Respectfully,
IT IS SO ORDERED that the call will
call Mr. Fiorilla at (856) 914-2054
between 1:30 and 4:30 p.m. PST. IST
CAPEHART & SCATCHARD, P.A.
RIC
TC
RT
U
O
ES D
AT
T
R NIA
LI
RT
Judge E
FO
. Chen
dward M
NO
20130609
IT IS S
s/John K. Fiorilla
John K. Fiorilla
H
E
A
JKF:pmb
UNIT
ED
S
____________________________
Edward M. Chen, U.S. District JudgeRDERED
OO
C
RN
Capehart & Scatchard, P.A. Laurel Corporate Center 8000 Midlantic Drive Suite 300 Mount Laurel, New Jersey 08054
F
DI
TO
S T RIC
856.234.6800 Fax 856.235.2786 www.capehart.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?