Canadian National Railway Company v. Phoenix Logistics, Inc.

Filing 17

ORDER re 16 telephonic appearance, filed by Canadian National Railway Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/12/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2012)

Download PDF
John K. Fiorilla 856.914.2054 jfiorilla@capehart.com March 12, 2012 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Hon. Edward M. Chen, U.S.D.J. United States Court House Courtroom 5- 17th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 Re: Canadian National Railway Company v. Phoenix Logistics, Inc. Case No. cv-11-4589 (EMC) Our File #0489.13104 Dear Judge Chen: This firm represents the plaintiff Canadian National Railway in the above captioned matter. On March 9, 2012, we received a telephone call from John Saul, Esq., brother of Fred Saul, Registered Agent of defendant, Phoenix Logistics, Inc., acknowledging receipt of the copies of the Case Management Scheduling Order and the Clerk’s Notice Continuing Motion Hearing #9 to 4/13/12 at 1:30 p.m. John Saul, Esq. advised that Phoenix Logistics, Inc, has been out of business for several months. There are no assets available to us and there are several judgments against Phoeix. He stated that Fred Saul will not be taking any action or responding to our Motion for Default Judgment scheduled as stated above. I respectfully request that the Court permit me to appear telephonically at the motion hearing in this matter. Respectfully, IT IS SO ORDERED that the call will call Mr. Fiorilla at (856) 914-2054 between 1:30 and 4:30 p.m. PST. IST CAPEHART & SCATCHARD, P.A. RIC TC RT U O ES D AT T R NIA LI RT Judge E FO . Chen dward M NO 20130609 IT IS S s/John K. Fiorilla John K. Fiorilla H E A JKF:pmb UNIT ED S ____________________________ Edward M. Chen, U.S. District JudgeRDERED OO C RN Capehart & Scatchard, P.A. Laurel Corporate Center 8000 Midlantic Drive Suite 300 Mount Laurel, New Jersey 08054 F DI TO S T RIC 856.234.6800 Fax 856.235.2786 www.capehart.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?